How Are Orbits and Orbitals Similar and Different in Quantum Mechanics?

AI Thread Summary
Orbits and orbitals share the similarity of representing regions where particles, such as electrons, are found in relation to a nucleus. However, they differ significantly in their dimensionality and representation; orbits are two-dimensional paths derived from Bohr's model, while orbitals are three-dimensional probability distributions defined by quantum mechanics. Additionally, orbits are fixed, imaginary paths that electrons cannot deviate from, whereas orbitals represent clouds where electrons have a probability of being found, allowing for more freedom of movement. Furthermore, orbits can contain orbitals, indicating a hierarchical relationship between the two concepts. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for grasping the fundamentals of quantum mechanics.
rojasharma
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
describe one way in which orbits and orbitals are similar, and two ways in which they differ.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
one way in which orbits and orbitals are similar ...is their motion? they are revolving around somthing...?
 
rojasharma said:
describe one way in which orbits and orbitals are similar, and two ways in which they differ.

First, the difference is 2 letters: al
Second, the orbital is a 3-dimensional volume of space where the probability of finding some electron is given by Quantum theory.
The orbit, on the other hand, is 2-dimensional (a circle) and comes from Bohr's model.
 
1. Orbits contain orbitals ... atleast in an atom
2. Orbits are imaginary PATHS while Orbitals are imaginary CLOUDS
3. The particles in an orbit restrict themselves strictly to it, while orbital particles are free to move out of their clouds (but mosly stay in that cloud itself) :wink:
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top