Timvanhoomissen
I'm having trouble understanding how simple particles can be received and then with that information translated into a song on the radio or a program on television. Any help?
Timvanhoomissen said:I'm having trouble understanding how simple particles can be received and then with that information translated into a song on the radio or a program on television. Any help?
Exactly ... as photons DONT carry messagesDale said:Why would you try to use quantum mechanics to analyze something that is perfectly well described with classical mechanics?
All information can be reduced to a stream of digital bits -1s and 0s -. And any physical thing that can be streamed between two points can be modulated to make a bit stream, provided there are enough of them. You could transmit pictures using a stream of ping pong balls. But it is simpler and much faster to use photons.Timvanhoomissen said:I'm having trouble understanding how simple particles can be received and then with that information translated into a song on the radio or a program on television. Any help?
Andrew Mason said:All information can be reduced to a stream of digital bits -1s and 0s -. And any physical thing that can be streamed between two points can be modulated to make a bit stream, provided there are enough of them. You could transmit pictures using a stream of ping pong balls. But it is simpler and much faster to use photons.
AM
It seems to me that you want too much, too quickly. Your post includes virtually the whole of communications theory and practice.Timvanhoomissen said:I'm having trouble understanding how simple particles can be received and then with that information translated into a song on the radio or a program on television. Any help?
Photons can have different energies corresponding to different frequencies. You can vary the energy/frequency to encode the signal.Timvanhoomissen said:I'm having trouble understanding how simple particles can be received and then with that information translated into a song on the radio or a program on television. Any help?
Maybe, but it seems to me that the original poster's difficulty is not with photons per se but with how complex information can be effectively carried by them. An individual photon cannot carry much information but a stream of them certainly can.davenn said:I think you missed the point of his mis-understanding ... reread Dale and my posts![]()
It's another demonstration of how people feel pressured to use 'photons' in any explanation of anything. It's as if it makes things more approachable but it's actually quite the opposite.Andrew Mason said:the original poster's difficulty is not with photons per se