Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the scoring of scaffolding questions on tests, particularly in the context of physics education. Participants explore various approaches to structuring tests, the use of free body diagrams (FBDs), and the implications of scaffolding for student assessment.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Conceptual clarification
- Meta-discussion
Main Points Raised
- Some participants express differing views on the necessity and naming of free body diagrams, with one stating they do not assign a special name to them, while another insists on using the term "FBD."
- There is a discussion about the effectiveness of "stepping stone" questions in tests, with some arguing they help students demonstrate their understanding, while others believe they should not be included in formal assessments.
- One participant mentions national guidelines that restrict the use of scaffolding questions on tests, suggesting that such questions should be reserved for classroom instruction.
- Another participant counters that rigid test structures may not accommodate the diverse needs of students and that different testing approaches can yield varied results.
- Concerns are raised about the potential confusion for students if they are asked to draw a diagram without a clear name or context.
- One participant shares their experience of providing students with exam questions in advance to prepare them for the structure of the final test, which is described as brutal.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants generally express multiple competing views regarding the use of scaffolding questions and the structure of tests. There is no consensus on whether scaffolding should be included in assessments or how free body diagrams should be utilized and named.
Contextual Notes
Participants reference national curriculum guidelines that may impose restrictions on test design, indicating that the discussion is influenced by differing educational standards and philosophies.