How are Stereographic Projections Derived in Differential Geometry?

niall14
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
In cartesian coordinates (x.y,z) on the and (X,Y) on the plane, the projection and its inverse are given by the following formulae:

(X,Y)=(x/1-z,y/1-z)

(x,y,z)=(2X/1+X^2+Y^2, 2Y/1+X^2+Y^2, -1+X^2+Y^2/1+X^2 +Y^2)

This relates to the field of differntial geo.Anybody have a proof to where thes equations are derived?

Thanks very much
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The derivation is straightforward if not somewhat cumbersome. Do you know how stereographic projection is defined? You take the straightline through a pole and a point on the sphere and project it onto the plane. Consider a fixed point on the sphere (x,y,z) and find the line through the North pole and (x,y,z). Then find where it intersects the plane z=0.
 
thanks for your reply.not really to sure what u mean by 'project'.if you could give me the first few lines of the proof I am sure i could figure it out.
 
I'll give you one direction, the other follows similarly but is definitely the harder direction. Consider the north pole (0,0,1) and let (x_0,y_0,z_0) be a point on the sphere. Then the line between the north pole and this point is given by
x = x_0 t, \qquad y = y_0 t, \qquad z = 1 + (z_0 - 1)t
which is easily calculated via basic geometric results. Notice that when t=0 we get the North pole, and when t = 1 we get the point on the sphere. Now we want to calculate where this line hits the z=0 plane, so in particular
z= 0 = 1+(z_0 - 1)t \quad \Rightarrow t = \frac1{1-z_0}
Substituting this value into the equation of the line we get the intersection of the line with the plane
\left( \frac{x_0}{1-z_0}, \frac{y_0}{1-z_0}, 0 \right)
and we drop the third coordinate since we want to identify the sphere with the plane.

Again, the other direction is a bit harder and more technical, but follows precisely the same idea. Give it a try yourself and see if you can get the right answer.
 
thanks ill give it a go
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top