How are Tranverse Magnetic and Transverse Electric Polarisations defined?

AI Thread Summary
Transverse Magnetic (TM) and Transverse Electric (TE) polarizations are defined in relation to the orientation of electromagnetic fields in cylindrical waveguides. TM modes have no magnetic field component along the cylinder axis, while TE modes lack an electric field component in that direction. Transverse Electro-Magnetic (TEM) modes, which have no components of either field along the axis, require the cylinder's cross-section to be not simply connected, such as in coaxial cables. These modes are advantageous as they allow for undisturbed signal propagation without dispersion in ideal conducting waveguides. Understanding these definitions is crucial for applications involving wave propagation in various cylindrical structures.
StephanJ
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I've seen this terminology being used a few times and knowing what it means exactly would be great. I gather that it's used to define Polarisations relative to a plane?

Any help would be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The terminology usually applies for cylindrical wave guides, where the cylinder can have any cross section, not only a circular one. One can prove from Maxwell's equations and the appropriate boundary conditions for the fields that each em. field can be expanded in a set of three types of eigenmodes that are

transverse electric (TE): The electric field has no component in direction of the cylinder axis,
transverse magnetic (TM): The magnetic field has no component in direction of the cylinder axis,
transverse electro-magnetic (TEM): both the electric and the magnetic field have no component in direction of the cylinder axis.

So, transverse is meant with respect to the cylinder axis. The TEM modes only exist if the cross section of the cylinder is not simply connected. A typical example is the usual caxial cable. These modes are particularly nice since they show no dispersion (in an ideally conducting wave guide), i.e., they admit an undistrubed signal propagation along the wave guide.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top