How big and soon and where will temp changes be?

  • Thread starter Thread starter venturerite
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential for extreme temperature changes due to climate change, questioning the likelihood of reaching temperatures like 160 degrees in summer or -100 degrees in winter. Participants agree that while significant temperature increases are expected, such extreme scenarios are unlikely to occur soon. The conversation highlights that the average global temperature has risen by about 0.7°C over the last century, primarily due to human activity, particularly greenhouse gas emissions. Concerns are raised about the impacts of climate change, including floods, pests, and disease, rather than extreme heat alone. Overall, the consensus indicates that while climate change poses serious risks, the most severe predictions are not expected in the near future.
venturerite
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
How possible is it that the changes in temp will continue to increase until, for a vague example: by the year 2020 we'll have 160 degree summers and -100 degree winters? (or some variation of extreme perpetual temp alteration)?

Nearly everyday reached 100 degrees in Salt Lake City all summer, will next summer be 105 all summer? And will the crops in Cali fail further than before to an even greater cold this coming winter?

Dan
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
I don't think anyone expects changes that large. To the extent that we do see radical changes, it will certainly not be that soon according to any model that I've seen [i.e. predictions from various models]. Realistically, floods, pests, population displacement, more intense storms, and disease are the biggest concerns. Heat waves are a concern as well, but not 160 degree heat waves. :biggrin:

On the down side, mass extinctions only require something like a 10 degree increase in the average temp, so we don't need 160 degree days to be in trouble. Currently, I believe that we have seen something like a 2 degree increase in the average temp over the last century, but I would have to review the literature to be sure about the latest conclusions and any consensus that might exist. And of course, only part of the temp rise is attributed to human activity with any confidence.
 
Last edited:
Ivan Seeking,

The increase in global temperatures the last century is ~.7oC. And all of that warming can be attributed to human activity, since man made aerosols are artificially suppressing the increased radiative forcings from GHG.

As Pinker et al demonstrate, as the atmosphere clears, instantaneous radiative flux continues to increase while solar irradiation has remained constant or even decreased.
 
Eleven of the last twelve years (1995–2006) rank among the 12 warmest years in the instrumental record of global surface temperature9 (since 1850). The updated 100-year linear trend (1906 to 2005) of 0.74°C [0.56°C to 0.92°C] is therefore larger than the corresponding trend for 1901 to 2000 given in the TAR of 0.6°C [0.4°C to 0.8°C].

So according to this, the change has been between 1 and 1.7 degrees F over the last century, with a mean of .74 degrees C as you stated.

Most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations.12 This is an advance since the TAR’s conclusion that “most of the observed warming over the last 50 years is likely to have been due to the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations”. Discernible human influences now extend to other aspects of climate, including ocean warming, continental-average temperatures, temperature extremes and wind patterns (see Figure SPM.4 and Table SPM.2). {9.4, 9.5}

...It is very unlikely that climate changes of at least the seven centuries prior to 1950 were due to variability generated within the climate system alone. A significant fraction of the reconstructed Northern Hemisphere inter-decadal temperature variability over those centuries is very likely attributable to volcanic eruptions and changes in solar irradiance, and it is likely that anthropogenic forcing contributed to the early 20th-century warming evident in these records. {2.7, 2.8, 6.6, 9.3}...
http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/Report/AR4WG1_Pub_SPM-v2.pdf

venturerite, if you go to page 13 of 18 of this report, you will find some predictions about future climate change.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello, I’m currently writing a series of essays on Pangaea, continental drift, and Earth’s geological cycles. While working on my research, I’ve come across some inconsistencies in the existing theories — for example, why the main pressure seems to have been concentrated in the northern polar regions. So I’m curious: is there any data or evidence suggesting that an external cosmic body (an asteroid, comet, or another massive object) could have influenced Earth’s geology in the distant...
Thread 'The Secrets of Prof. Verschure's Rosetta Stones'
(Edit: since the thread title was changed, this first sentence is too cryptic: the original title referred to a Tool song....) Besides being a favorite song by a favorite band, the thread title is a straightforward play on words. This summer, as a present to myself for being promoted, I purchased a collection of thin sections that I believe comprise the research materials of Prof. Rob Verschure, who at the time was faculty in the Geological Institute in Amsterdam. What changed this...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top