SpaceX's 5K Satellites: A Risk of Man-Made Meteors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter swampwiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Satellites
AI Thread Summary
SpaceX's plan to deploy 5,000 satellites in low Earth orbit raises concerns about the risk of man-made meteors if these satellites malfunction or deplete their fuel. The discussion highlights that the size of a satellite is not the only factor in determining whether it will burn up upon reentry; density and shape are also crucial. For instance, large solar panel arrays may disintegrate, while denser objects could survive reentry. Historical examples, such as Skylab, illustrate the potential dangers of satellite debris falling to Earth. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for careful consideration of satellite design to mitigate risks associated with reentry.
swampwiz
Messages
567
Reaction score
83
I was reading about SpaceX wanting to put up 5K satellites, with these put in a low enough orbit that they would need to be periodically boosted to stay up, and simply falling out of the sky within a few months if they malfunction or run out of fuel. This makes me wonder about how small a satellite would need to be to be assured of burning up completely - lest we get man-made "meteors".
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Size alone is a meaningless criterion. You need to know the density and general shape. For example, a HUGE array of solar panels would burn up on reentry but the same mass as a solid dense sphere might not.
 
IIRC, Skylab showered parts of Australia with its components. Low density stuff just fluttered down, titanium pressure tanks played 'drop bear'...
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top