How Can a 3D PDE Be Simplified to a 1D Equation in Theta?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ido
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    1d 3d Pde
AI Thread Summary
The given 3D partial differential equation (PDE) can be simplified to a 1D equation in the theta direction by applying constraints that restrict the problem to a simple ring. By assuming that the function F depends only on the theta coordinate, the Laplacian can be reduced to a second derivative with respect to theta. This leads to the simplified 1D PDE: (1/a)*d/dtheta(a*dF/dtheta) + a*E*F = 0. The solution is valid under the specified constraints, and any changes to these constraints would necessitate a reevaluation of the PDE. This approach allows for the application of standard methods for solving 1D PDEs.
Ido
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I got the following PDE:
Laplasian[F]+a*d(F)/d(teta)=E*F

I worked with cylindrical coordinates (r,teta,z)
(teta is the angle between the x-axis and the r vector (in xy plane))
a,E are constants

I got the constrains: z=0 r=a , so the whole problem is on a simple ring

How can I make the 3D PDE just 1D in teta?
Can I use the Laplasian in cylindrical coordinates, and throw away the d/dr and d/dz?

I hope someone can help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Without separation of variables (which I know you don't want to do), I don't see a way.
 


The given PDE can be simplified to a 1D PDE in the teta direction by making use of the constraints given. Since the whole problem is on a simple ring, we can assume that the function F is only dependent on the teta coordinate. Therefore, the Laplacian operator in cylindrical coordinates can be simplified to just the second derivative with respect to teta, i.e. Laplacian[F] = (1/r)*d/dr(r*dF/dteta).

Furthermore, since the constraints state that z=0 and r=a, any terms containing the z or r coordinates can be eliminated. This leaves us with the simplified 1D PDE:

(1/a)*d/dteta(a*dF/dteta) + a*E*F = 0

This can be solved using standard methods for solving 1D PDEs. It is important to note that the solution obtained will only be valid for the specific constraints given, i.e. for the problem on a simple ring. If the constraints were to change, the PDE would need to be re-evaluated accordingly.

In summary, to make the 3D PDE just 1D in teta, we can use the Laplacian in cylindrical coordinates and eliminate any terms containing the z or r coordinates based on the given constraints. This will result in a simplified 1D PDE that can be solved using appropriate methods.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top