How Can a Frog's Jumping Pattern Lead to Normal Distribution Behavior?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the mathematical analysis of a frog's jumping pattern modeled by a Laplace distribution. The moment generating function (MGF) for the random variable X, representing the frog's displacement, is established as M_{X}(\theta) = \frac{1}{1 - \theta^2}, leading to a variance of 2. The challenge lies in deriving the MGF for \frac{Y}{\sqrt{2n}}, where Y is the sum of n independent jumps, and demonstrating that it converges to e^{\frac{1}{2}x^{2}} as n approaches infinity. This convergence indicates that the distribution of the frog's displacement approaches a normal distribution, allowing for the estimation of the minimum number of jumps required for a 5% chance of landing 25 cm or more from the starting point.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace distribution and its properties
  • Knowledge of moment generating functions (MGFs)
  • Familiarity with the Central Limit Theorem
  • Basic calculus for evaluating integrals and limits
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of moment generating functions for various distributions
  • Learn about the Central Limit Theorem and its applications in probability
  • Explore the properties of the Laplace distribution in depth
  • Investigate statistical methods for estimating probabilities in normal distributions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, statisticians, and students studying probability theory, particularly those interested in the applications of the Laplace distribution and normal approximation in real-world scenarios.

FeDeX_LaTeX
Science Advisor
Messages
436
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


Let X be a random variable with a Laplace distribution, so that its probability density function
is given by

[tex]f(x) = \frac{1}{2}e^{-|x|}[/tex]

Sketch f(x). Show that its moment generating function MX (θ) is given by

[tex]M_{X}(\theta) = \frac{1}{1 - \theta^2}[/tex]

and hence find the variance of X.

A frog is jumping up and down, attempting to land on the same spot each time. In fact, in
each of n successive jumps he always lands on a fixed straight line but when he lands from the ith jump (i = 1 , 2 , . . . , n) his displacement from the point from which he jumped is Xi cm, where Xi has the Laplace distribution described above. His displacement from his starting point after n jumps is
Y cm, so that [itex]Y = \sum_{i=1}^{n} X_{i}[/itex].

Each jump is independent of the others.

Obtain the moment generating function for [itex]\frac{Y}{\sqrt{2n}}[/itex] and, by considering its logarithm, show that this moment generating function tends to [itex]e^{\frac{1}{2}x^{2}}[/itex] as n → ∞.

Given that [itex]e^{\frac{1}{2}x^{2}}[/itex] is the moment generating function of the standard Normal random variable, estimate the least number of jumps such that there is a 5% chance that the frog lands 25 cm or more from his starting point.


Homework Equations



[itex]M_{X}(t) = E(e^{tX}) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{tx}f(x)dx[/itex]


The Attempt at a Solution



I've sketched f(x), which looks like the graph of [itex]\frac{1}{2}e^x[/itex] for x < 0 and [itex]\frac{1}{2}e^{-x}[/itex] for x > 0.

I've found the moment generating function, and deduced that it has mean 0 and variance 2.

However, I'm unable to obtain the moment generating function for [itex]\frac{Y}{\sqrt{2n}}[/itex]. The mark scheme says this:

If [itex]T = \frac{Y}{\sqrt{2n}}[/itex], then [itex]M_{T}(\theta) = E(e^{T\theta}) = E(e^{\theta \sum \frac{X_{i}}{\sqrt{2n}}}) = \prod_{i=1}^{n}E(e^{\frac{\theta}{\sqrt{2n}}X_{i}}) = \left( 1 - \frac{\theta^{2}}{2n} \right)^n[/itex]

I understand everything up until where the last part; how are they turning that product into that neat (1 - theta^2 / 2n)^n term? My approach was to say that all the Xi have the same distribution, so every term in the product is the same, and you get this:

[itex]\left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{2n}}M_{X}(\theta) \right)^n = \left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2n}(1 - \theta^{2})} \right)^n[/itex]

but this is clearly not equivalent to their answer. What have I done wrong here and what have they done to collapse their product into something so simple?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
FeDeX_LaTeX said:

Homework Statement


Let X be a random variable with a Laplace distribution, so that its probability density function
is given by

[tex]f(x) = \frac{1}{2}e^{-|x|}[/tex]

Sketch f(x). Show that its moment generating function MX (θ) is given by

[tex]M_{X}(\theta) = \frac{1}{1 - \theta^2}[/tex]

and hence find the variance of X.

A frog is jumping up and down, attempting to land on the same spot each time. In fact, in
each of n successive jumps he always lands on a fixed straight line but when he lands from the ith jump (i = 1 , 2 , . . . , n) his displacement from the point from which he jumped is Xi cm, where Xi has the Laplace distribution described above. His displacement from his starting point after n jumps is
Y cm, so that [itex]Y = \sum_{i=1}^{n} X_{i}[/itex].

Each jump is independent of the others.

Obtain the moment generating function for [itex]\frac{Y}{\sqrt{2n}}[/itex] and, by considering its logarithm, show that this moment generating function tends to [itex]e^{\frac{1}{2}x^{2}}[/itex] as n → ∞.

Given that [itex]e^{\frac{1}{2}x^{2}}[/itex] is the moment generating function of the standard Normal random variable, estimate the least number of jumps such that there is a 5% chance that the frog lands 25 cm or more from his starting point.


Homework Equations



[itex]M_{X}(t) = E(e^{tX}) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{tx}f(x)dx[/itex]


The Attempt at a Solution



I've sketched f(x), which looks like the graph of [itex]\frac{1}{2}e^x[/itex] for x < 0 and [itex]\frac{1}{2}e^{-x}[/itex] for x > 0.

I've found the moment generating function, and deduced that it has mean 0 and variance 2.

However, I'm unable to obtain the moment generating function for [itex]\frac{Y}{\sqrt{2n}}[/itex]. The mark scheme says this:

If [itex]T = \frac{Y}{\sqrt{2n}}[/itex], then [itex]M_{T}(\theta) = E(e^{T\theta}) = E(e^{\theta \sum \frac{X_{i}}{\sqrt{2n}}}) = \prod_{i=1}^{n}E(e^{\frac{\theta}{\sqrt{2n}}X_{i}}) = \left( 1 - \frac{\theta^{2}}{2n} \right)^n[/itex]

I understand everything up until where the last part; how are they turning that product into that neat (1 - theta^2 / 2n)^n term? My approach was to say that all the Xi have the same distribution, so every term in the product is the same, and you get this:

[itex]\left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{2n}}M_{X}(\theta) \right)^n = \left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2n}(1 - \theta^{2})} \right)^n[/itex]

but this is clearly not equivalent to their answer. What have I done wrong here and what have they done to collapse their product into something so simple?

Careful: ##M_{X/\sqrt{2n}}(\theta) = E \exp(\theta X /\sqrt{2n})= M_X(u), \: u = \theta /\sqrt{2n}.## This is NOT equal to ##(1/\sqrt{2n}) M_X(\theta).## However, you are partly right: they should not have written ##(1- \theta^2/2n)^n##; it should be ##(1- \theta^2 / 2n)^{-n}.##
 
Ray Vickson said:
Careful: ##M_{X/\sqrt{2n}}(\theta) = E \exp(\theta X /\sqrt{2n})= M_X(u), \: u = \theta /\sqrt{2n}.## This is NOT equal to ##(1/\sqrt{2n}) M_X(\theta).## However, you are partly right: they should not have written ##(1- \theta^2/2n)^n##; it should be ##(1- \theta^2 / 2n)^{-n}.##

Sorry, that was my typo -- they did write that term to the negative power of n.

Okay thanks, I think that makes sense -- so [itex]M_{X}(a \theta) \neq aM_{X}(\theta)[/itex]?

Thanks, it makes so much sense now, they've just replaced the theta with theta / sqrt(2n) :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K