How Can a Generic Vector Be Decomposed Using the Helmholtz Theorem?

Legion81
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
I have to show that a generic vector can be decomposed into an irrotational and solenoidal component:

V(r) = -Grad[phi(r)] + Curl[A(r)]

I'm not sure how to start. Do I need to take the curl or div of V and use a vector identity? Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Helmholtz' Theorem starts with the two components in my original post and defines the divergence and curl as:

div[V] = s(r)
and
curl[V] = c(r), where div[c(r)] = 0

But I can't find anything about how we can define a generic vector as two components:

V = -grad[phi] + curl[A], where "phi" is the scalar potential and "A" is the vector potential. I need to do this before I can show that s(r) and c(r) uniquely specify the vector.

I hope that makes my problem a little more clear.
 
Legion81 said:
I have to show that a generic vector can be decomposed into an irrotational and solenoidal component:

V(r) = -Grad[phi(r)] + Curl[A(r)]

I'm not sure how to start. Do I need to take the curl or div of V and use a vector identity?

Taking the divergence/curl of both sides of this equation seems like a good place to start. What do you get when you do that?

P.S. You may wish to use boldface font to denote vectors, to make things clear.
 
I actually just found an easy way of showing it using projection operators. Thanks for the reply.

Consider this question solved.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top