How can a vector be resolved into components in various directions?

AI Thread Summary
A vector can be resolved into components multiple times, but it's generally more efficient to use the original force rather than repeatedly resolving projections. In the case of a mass on a wedge, the weight can be expressed as mg sin(theta) and mg cos(theta), which are the primary components along the incline. If further resolution is needed, one should consider the original force and the specific angles involved rather than complicating the resolution with additional projections. The inclination angle limits the directions in which components can be effectively resolved. Ultimately, it's best to choose the most useful axes for the problem at hand.
sArGe99
Messages
133
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I just want to get my concepts right again. How many times can a vector be resolved into horizontal and vertical components? In the case of a mass placed on a wedge, the weight of the body can be resolved into mg sin (angle) and mg cos(angle). Can this mg sin(angle) be further resolved and resolved again... Surely it would have components in every direction, then?

Homework Equations



Resolution using sine and cosine functions

The Attempt at a Solution


Again, none of the books really helped me on this
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sArGe99 said:

Homework Statement


I just want to get my concepts right again. How many times can a vector be resolved into horizontal and vertical components? In the case of a mass placed on a wedge, the weight of the body can be resolved into mg sin (angle) and mg cos(angle). Can this mg sin(angle) be further resolved and resolved again... Surely it would have components in every direction, then?

Homework Equations



Resolution using sine and cosine functions

The Attempt at a Solution


Again, none of the books really helped me on this

Typically you want to choose a useful axis set. Gravity direction usually makes a fine choice and ⊥ planes make up useful 2nd and 3rd dimensions.

But generally you don't make a lot of different projections of things that are already projections since the original forces can be projected in whatever angles you need directly.
 
But in cases, like the one with an inclined plane the angle of inclination is given, it cannot be changed - say its theta. If we want the projection to be in other directions than what is given by sine and cosine components of theta, what do we do?
For example, mg sin theta acts parallel to the wedge surface and cosine component perpendicular. But what if we need a component parallel to the horizontal?
 
sArGe99 said:
But in cases, like the one with an inclined plane the angle of inclination is given, it cannot be changed - say its theta. If we want the projection to be in other directions than what is given by sine and cosine components of theta, what do we do?
For example, mg sin theta acts parallel to the wedge surface and cosine component perpendicular. But what if we need a component parallel to the horizontal?

I look to the original force wherever possible. Why take sines of cosines if you don't have to?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top