How Can Advanced Techniques Improve Short Circuit Detection?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Blah937
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Short
AI Thread Summary
Advanced techniques for short circuit detection can enhance existing hardware and firmware that sends pulses and measures responses in circuits. Suggestions include adding test loads or applying different signals to improve detection accuracy. Utilizing a method similar to a DMM beep, applying voltage through a moderate source impedance can help identify shorts by measuring voltage or current. Additionally, programming board testers with data from known good boards allows for efficient identification of shorts and opens in unknown boards. Implementing these strategies can significantly improve the reliability of short circuit detection systems.
Blah937
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
This is a theoretical question. Say we are imagining a way to detect whether a pair of circuits might be shorted together. There’s already hardware and firmware that sends pulses out on both of the circuits, and measures the response on the outputs. So, would we want to recommend additional hardware and/or software to apply test loads (R and/or C), or different signals, to any of those circuits?

In any case if the above doesn't make sense...how can we generally detect if there is a short in our circuit? I'm not looking for just apply a DMM and see if it beeps. lol. Thanks though! Any input would be greatly appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Blah937 said:
This is a theoretical question. Say we are imagining a way to detect whether a pair of circuits might be shorted together. There’s already hardware and firmware that sends pulses out on both of the circuits, and measures the response on the outputs. So, would we want to recommend additional hardware and/or software to apply test loads (R and/or C), or different signals, to any of those circuits?

In any case if the above doesn't make sense...how can we generally detect if there is a short in our circuit? I'm not looking for just apply a DMM and see if it beeps. lol. Thanks though! Any input would be greatly appreciated.

You pretty much use a technique analogous to what the DVM beeping tells you. Apply a voltage through a moderate source impedance and measure the voltage on the far side of the source impedance. Alternately you could measure the current through the source impedance, but just do whatever is easiest in your circuit.
 
Blah937 said:
...

In any case if the above doesn't make sense...how can we generally detect if there is a short in our circuit? I'm not looking for just apply a DMM and see if it beeps. lol. Thanks though! Any input would be greatly appreciated.

That made me smile ...
well the other option is ... the short cct is likely to be where the greatest amount of circuit damage is done and from whence the smoke has issued :-p

Dave
 
Once when troubleshooting a board I had access to an ohmmeter that could measure milliohms. I could actually measure the resistance of the traces and by following the path of least resistance I was able to find the short fairly rapidly.

When I used to program board testers, we programmed the testers using a known good board. With that board we generated a table of known shorts and known opens. When an unknown board was tested, running through the shorts and opens was very fast and very effective. Only after passing shorts and opens would the tester check the impedances between nodes.
 
skeptic2 said:
when i used to program board testers, we programmed the testers using a known good board. With that board we generated a table of known shorts and known opens. When an unknown board was tested, running through the shorts and opens was very fast and very effective. Only after passing shorts and opens would the tester check the impedances between nodes.

Also known as ATE.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top