How can an object move without acceleration?

AI Thread Summary
An object can move without acceleration by maintaining a constant velocity, which implies negligible acceleration. The discussion clarifies that the concept of potential difference relates to the difference in work done on particles rather than their speed. Two particles can move at constant speeds but require different amounts of work to maintain that motion, resulting in a measurable potential difference. Additionally, not all objects must start from rest; their initial conditions depend on the reference frame being considered. Understanding these principles helps clarify the relationship between work, potential difference, and motion.
Evenus1
Messages
29
Reaction score
2
hi every one.
ive been digging around on the idea of volt edge and have come across the idea that potential difference is the difference in electrical potential. this is the energy required to move a particle between two reference points without acceleration?
i apologies at my lack of knowledge but am only doing my GCSE's. any ways how can an object move without acceleration between two points and there be a difference in this.
many thanks
Ewen shackel
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It can move at a constant velocity. Although, often people mean "negligible acceleration" when they say "constant velocity".
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
ok so would we say that the particles are already moving but at different speeds and that this difference is what we are measuring when we measure voltage?
and thank you for your reply
 
Not the difference in speed, but the difference in work. So say we have two particles moving at whatever constant speed they happen to be moving at. One takes twice as much work as the other, so the potential difference was twice as much as the other. The speed is irrelevant as long as it is constant.
 
Dale said:
Not the difference in speed, but the difference in work. So say we have two particles moving at whatever constant speed they happen to be moving at. One takes twice as much work as the other, so the potential difference was twice as much as the other. The speed is irrelevant as long as it is constant.
ahh thank you very much that hass clear up the idea a lot.
 
Dale said:
Not the difference in speed, but the difference in work. So say we have two particles moving at whatever constant speed they happen to be moving at. One takes twice as much work as the other, so the potential difference was twice as much as the other. The speed is irrelevant as long as it is constant.
Out of curiosity, does everything have an initial acceleration? obviously they have to start from 0 and rise to get to a constant velocity correct? trying piece things together with the same subject.
thank you.
 
Dcastillo said:
obviously they have to start from 0 and rise to get to a constant velocity correct?
This is not necessary. If it starts at 0 in some reference frame then in other frames that same thing will not start at 0.
 
Back
Top