How Can Approximations by Expansion Simplify Scientific Calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter eep
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expansion
AI Thread Summary
Approximations by expansion, such as Taylor series, simplify scientific calculations by allowing complex functions to be expressed as power series, making them easier to compute. For instance, the momentum equation p^t = m/√(1 - v^2) can be approximated for small velocities (v << 1) as p^t = m + (1/2)mv^2. The convergence of these series depends on the radius of convergence, which determines the range of values for which the series accurately represents the function. In special relativity, where velocity is always less than the speed of light, such expansions remain valid. Understanding these mathematical tools is crucial for simplifying calculations in various scientific fields.
eep
Messages
225
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I've never really studied various ways of expanding expressions in order to obtain an approximation that can make calculations easier. For example,

<br /> p^t = \frac{m}{\sqrt{1 - v^2}}<br />

reduces to

<br /> p^t = m + \frac{1}{2}mv^2 + ...<br />

for v << 1.

How does one arrive at something like this? What other expansions are useful? I used to think that I'd just calculate everything exactly but I now realize these sorts of expansions are extremeley important.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Are you familiar with Taylor series? It says that if a function can be expanded in a power series, then it will be of the form

f(x) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{f^{(n)}(0)}{n!}x^n

Wheter this series converges towards the original function is another matter. (Actually, it is a matter of calculating the radius of convergence of a power series)

For exemple, the function f(x) = (1+x)^r where r is any real number has as its Taylor expansion

\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{r(r-1)...(r-n+1)}{n!}x^n

and the series converges to f(x) = (1+x)^r for all |x|<1 but not for any other value of x.

This is exactly what has been done in your post. p(v)=m(1+v^2)^{-1/2} is of the form (1+x)^r with x=-v² and r=-½, so it converges to the series expansion you wrote for all values of v such that |v²|<1.

N.B. in the context of special relativity, v is always lesser than 1 since it has been assumed that c=1, so the formula really is valid for all velocity.The only other expansion I know of is the expansion in a Fourier series.
 
Last edited:
Btw, wouldn't it be
<br /> p = m - \frac{1}{2}mv^2 + ...<br />
instead? (with a "-" sign instead of a "+" sign on odd terms)
 
The sign is +. It results from multiplying two - signs, -1/2 and -v2.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top