How Can B Hatfield's Book Clarify QFT Through Solved Examples?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sanko
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qft
sanko
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
i'm trying to learn qft. i have referred many books most of them have same pattern giving some intuitive idea followed by proof or formula derivation but i need solved examples/applications of this formulas or proofs for better understanding e.g. second quantization "momentum" and "position" are converted to operators acting on field or annihilation operator decreases number of particles by one. statements like this along with formula are only stated by authors and never applied to any example nor explained so can you suggest me some book or lecture notes ppts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there much experimental data/results that can be explained using simple QFT?

Text books usually begin by describing the K-G eq. as a failed attempt at relativistic QM, but later mention it to be the correct QFT eq. for a scalar field, so (for example) are there real experiments involving neutral pions (or any effective scalar particles) for which some results can be correctly predicted simply with scalar QFT? (As it is, introductory texts tend to have very little connection with physical reality, and the problem sets seem overly theoretical.)
 
This one specifically emphasises step-by-step calculations of many of the results:

B Hatfield - Quantum Field Theory of Point Particles and Strings (1992)

(first ~400 pages are an intro to QFT)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top