Undergrad How Can Boundary Layer Suction Reduce Flow Separation in Pipe Expansion?

Click For Summary
Boundary layer suction can effectively reduce flow separation in pipe expansions by creating a localized low-pressure zone that enhances the pressure gradient toward the wall. This process draws high-momentum fluid from the free stream into the boundary layer, resulting in a fuller boundary layer that is more resistant to separation. The mechanism involves the establishment of a favorable pressure gradient, which helps maintain flow attachment and reduces head loss. While implementing suction incurs an energy cost, it is expected to lower the resistance coefficient below the initial value of 0.46. Overall, boundary layer suction is a viable strategy for mitigating flow separation in pipe expansions.
Timtam
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
I have a question about the following scenario involving a flow separation issue in a pipe expansion

upload_2016-4-12_11-28-27.png


The angle of the expansion is 30* - doubling the diameter from 1D to 2D

We can consider this flow fully developed with a Reynolds of 5000+

Associated with this expansion is a head loss caused by localised flow separation converting flow to eddies and vortices which I understand to then cascade down to the Kolmogorov length scale where they are dispersed as heat.

If I was to zoom in the localisation might look like this

upload_2016-4-12_11-28-27.png


The K factor resistant coefficient associated with this configuration is 0.46

Current tables
upload_2016-4-12_11-28-27.png

In aerodynamics they use boundary layer control suction (removing Boundary Layer Static Pressure) or re-energizing the flow adding Dynamic Pressure) to reduce drag associated with flow separation

upload_2016-4-12_11-28-27.png
I am similarly interested in using boundary layer suction in my pipe (by reducing pressure at the start of the expansion to reduce the head loss**) but I am unsure I understand the actual mechanism that achieves this

My attempt at an explanation Suction creates a localized low pressure zone ( ahead of the localized high pressure zone created by the stagnated flow within the boundary). This creates a new gradient with which this high pressure can disperse . As this gradient is in the streamwise direction this allows the energy to rejoin the flow as DPMy Question

Is this correct ? Would my resistance coefficient be lower than the 0.46 the pressure loss the expansion experiences without suction ?

**I am aware that adding suction will cost energy which will be more than the flow recovered: therefore will be energy deficit. I am only concerned with lowering the Resistance coefficient
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-4-11_17-49-57.png
    upload_2016-4-11_17-49-57.png
    49.1 KB · Views: 570
Physics news on Phys.org
Suction does create a localized low pressure zone near the wall, but the important effect here is that, while there was no wall- normal pressure gradient before (it's a boundary layer, after all), there is now a favorable pressure gradient, however slight, pointing toward the wall. This tends to draw more high-momentum fluid from the free stream down toward the wall, and promotes having a "fuller" boundary layer than would otherwise occur. The result is a boundary layer that, among other things, is more resistant to separation.

I do believe it makes sense that you would experience less flow resistance if you were to add suction as you have described.
 
Thread 'What is the pressure of trapped air inside this tube?'
As you can see from the picture, i have an uneven U-shaped tube, sealed at the short end. I fill the tube with water and i seal it. So the short side is filled with water and the long side ends up containg water and trapped air. Now the tube is sealed on both sides and i turn it in such a way that the traped air moves at the short side. Are my claims about pressure in senarios A & B correct? What is the pressure for all points in senario C? (My question is basically coming from watching...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K