How Can Continuity be Ensured for Functions with Discontinuities at x=2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ElectricMile
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Figure
AI Thread Summary
To ensure continuity for the function f(x) = sin(pi x) / (x-2) at x=2, it is necessary to define f(2) as the limit of f(x) as x approaches 2, which results in a removable discontinuity. The limit evaluates to 0, indicating that f(2) should be set to 0 for continuity. For the second function f(x) = (ax-4)/(x-2) for x not equal to 2 and b for x=2, the value of b is confirmed to be 2, while the value of a needs to be determined by ensuring the overall function remains continuous at x=2. The discussion suggests using L'Hôpital's rule to resolve the limit for the first function, although the original poster is encouraged to work through it independently. Overall, continuity at x=2 requires careful consideration of limits and piecewise definitions.
ElectricMile
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
1) the given function is defined for x>0 except for x=2. Find the value to be assigned to f(2), if any, to guarantee that f is continuous at 2.

f( x ) = sin(pi x) / (x-2)

cant figure out how to change the equation so i can plug 2 in, i think I am loking right past it, tried multiplying by x-2, didnt work

2) For what value of the constants a and b is the function f continuous for all x

f(x) = ( (ax-4)/(x-2) x not equal to 2
|
| b x = 2
(

i know b is equal to to, but can't figure out how to change the first equation to find a.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ElectricMile said:
1) the given function is defined for x>0 except for x=2. Find the value to be assigned to f(2), if any, to guarantee that f is continuous at 2.

f( x ) = sin(pi x) / (x-2)

cant figure out how to change the equation so i can plug 2 in, i think I am loking right past it, tried multiplying by x-2, didnt work

2) For what value of the constants a and b is the function f continuous for all x

f(x) = ( (ax-4)/(x-2) x not equal to 2
|
| b x = 2
(

i know b is equal to to, but can't figure out how to change the first equation to find a.
For the first question, do you mean "to guarantee that f is discontinuous at 2"? If that's what you mean, just substitute x=2 into the equation. You should be able to see right away that it cannot exist at that point. Hint: look at the denominator...
 
For number 1 you have a removable discontinuity. You don't actually change the equation you must make f(x) into a piecewise defined function so that when x=2 the definition of f(x) is such that it is defined and so that it is continuous at x=2. So you would want to know the limit of f(x) as x approached 2. that is a 0/0 so you need to figure out what to do from here.

Good luck
 
Last edited:
for number 2, all I see is an a in the expression you gave. I would need to know where the b is to figure that one out. Maybe you could rewrite it and make sure it is exactly as it should be? Then I might be able to help you some more.

Regards
 
can't you just use L'Hopital's rule for the first part
 
stunner5000pt said:
can't you just use L'Hopital's rule for the first part

Yeah but he was suppose to figure that one out on his own... :wink:
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top