How Can Equation (13) Be Converted into the Matrix Form Ax = B?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gihan sky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex
Gihan sky
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Please help on solving these difficult equations

In the pdf document I attached there are equations numbered (12) ,(13), (14).
These are similar equations.
I want to find a way to iteratively solve the equation number (13).
I was told that this equation can be rearranged to the form, "Ax=B".
Please help me on re-arranging the terms of this equation to this form.

Thank you.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You want to solve equation 13 for WHAT variable?
 
I want to solve these equation 13 for variable "n". Here n[j] is the electron density in the i,j position at time "t+1".

So the matrix "x" (if this can be rearranged to the form Ax=B) should contain the values of "n" at the positions (i,j),(i,j-1),(i,j+1),(i-1,j),(i+1,j).

matrix "B" would contain the all the constant terms at time "t".(D(E,x), R(n,p) & n[t]).

Thank you
 
Can somebody convert equation 13 into the matrix form.
i.e Ax=B
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top