How Can I Balance Higher-Level Physics Study and Maintain High Grades?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ryanzmw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physicist
AI Thread Summary
Struggling with higher-level physics while maintaining good grades is a common challenge for aspiring physicists. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding when to make approximations in physics, particularly in topics like heat transfer. Students often face the dilemma of whether they are overthinking concepts that require simplifications. It is emphasized that knowing which effects can be ignored is crucial for problem-solving and is not always well-taught in the curriculum. Engaging with practical examples, such as assessing the significance of kinetic energy in energy balance equations, can help clarify these assumptions. The key takeaway is that while it's essential to think critically about physics concepts, students should also focus on mastering the foundational principles to maintain their academic performance.
Ryanzmw
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Ok, I've known for awhile now, that I want to be a physicist however, since I've started reading online materials at a higher level, my grades have been suffering. I'm wondering if I've begun to over think things. For example studying heat we were told to "Ignore" some heat transfers taking place. Am I overthinking? And is there anyway I can continue to study higher level phyics and still get high grades?

For reference, I am excelling in chemistry and biology and studying GCSE triple science and Astronomy.

Also is there any material I should read prior to the start of GCSE Astronomy, to help me get high grades.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ryanzmw said:
Ok, I've known for awhile now, that I want to be a physicist however, since I've started reading online materials at a higher level, my grades have been suffering. I'm wondering if I've begun to over think things. For example studying heat we were told to "Ignore" some heat transfers taking place. Am I overthinking? And is there anyway I can continue to study higher level phyics and still get high grades?.

One of, if not the most, important skills in physics is knowing when to make approximations and how correct they are. In my opinion it's not really taught well in the curriculum, but knowing when certain effects can be ignored and when they cannot is extremely important. You might have to take some of this on faith, but otherwise do try to convince yourself that what you're ignoring indeed is insignificant compared to other effects in the problem.
 
For example studying heat we were told to "Ignore" some heat transfers taking place.

I used to question these assumptions too. This last semester, I took a course on engineering thermodynamics. When constructing energy balance equations, we were often told to ignore effects from kinetic energy in favor of changes in enthalpy, heat, and work.

Then one day the prof threw a curve ball and told us to calculate a change in energy including effects from kinetic energy. Want to know what changed? About a dozen joules - in a system where the kinetic energy changed by multiple kilojoules. If you ever question these assumptions, then do a side project and see just how accurate the assumption is. Usually the assumptions are pretty safe.
 
Ryanzmw said:
Ok, I've known for awhile now, that I want to be a physicist however, since I've started reading online materials at a higher level, my grades have been suffering. I'm wondering if I've begun to over think things. For example studying heat we were told to "Ignore" some heat transfers taking place. Am I overthinking? And is there anyway I can continue to study higher level phyics and still get high grades?
I don't think you're over thinking, it sounds, like with many students, you're 'over thinking' improperly. It's necessary to think about why assumptions are necessary, good and physical.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top