How Can I Calculate Crystallite Size from XRD Patterns?

Rasputin
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody!

I have a question: how can I calculate the particle size?

It is common technique which called Scherrer equation used by XRD, it is also used TEM and SEM images, but I want be sure with my calculations and not to trust only to mentioned techniques.

Thank you for your answers.

Rasputin.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
particle size

Dear Rasputin,

From XRD u will get crystallite size , and from SEM particle size. Bothe are two different entities.

About sherrer formula, it is basic and fundamental. U can refer
AZAROFF & BUERGER, The Powder Method in X-ray Crystallography.

If this won't solve ur problem we will discuss.
 
mahixs said:
Dear Rasputin,

From XRD u will get crystallite size , and from SEM particle size. Bothe are two different entities.
Last time i checked the SEM resolution does not allow you to scale down up to the atomic scale. To do that, you need TEM. Also, keep in mind that individual atoms are not depicted directly. this violates the HUP ! What we observe using the above mentioned techniques, is the consequence (ie emitted radiation etc) of the interactions between apparatus and specimen ! One does not just "take a picture of an atom". We only observe atomic scale phenomena indirectly !

marlon
 
Hi buddies I am new to this forum
I came to the forum serching for crystallite size determination form XRD Patterns
I am new to reserch and do not posses any special knowledge on PXRD right now i am working on Zeolites and the only tool is PXRD i am eager to learn about it and want every information which can be obtained form it ie crystallite size, stacking faults, etc.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top