drizzle
Gold Member
- 200
- 58
you do realize there’s something known as the full width at half maximum (FWHM);
B2=B2obs – B2m
where Bobs is the measured peak width and Bm is the beak broadening due to the machine.
[it also can be determined by ω scan* which could vary with increasing temperature depending on your sample]. as for your question about how accurate is it? it’s an accurate method to determine the size of the grain, I don’t think you need to compare it to any. in fact, it can measure up to nano scale and can specify if the sample powder is nano particles or not, as far as I know this is the most effective measuring method and the most used. hope I’m helping
* the crystal quality of a sample is confirmed by a ω scan (out-of-plane rocking curve θ[degrees] vs. intensity[a.u.]), which could measure for a specific peak. and by saying half maximum it means the half-way of the peak's intensity. this shows the variation of the FWHM of the XRD ω scan for the peaks as a function of the film growth temperature [since it has been asked previously].
B2=B2obs – B2m
where Bobs is the measured peak width and Bm is the beak broadening due to the machine.
[it also can be determined by ω scan* which could vary with increasing temperature depending on your sample]. as for your question about how accurate is it? it’s an accurate method to determine the size of the grain, I don’t think you need to compare it to any. in fact, it can measure up to nano scale and can specify if the sample powder is nano particles or not, as far as I know this is the most effective measuring method and the most used. hope I’m helping
* the crystal quality of a sample is confirmed by a ω scan (out-of-plane rocking curve θ[degrees] vs. intensity[a.u.]), which could measure for a specific peak. and by saying half maximum it means the half-way of the peak's intensity. this shows the variation of the FWHM of the XRD ω scan for the peaks as a function of the film growth temperature [since it has been asked previously].