How can I create a constant flow? (not sure where to post)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Parker Hame
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Flow
AI Thread Summary
To create a timer without chemical reactions or electricity, a constant flow of water can be achieved through various methods. Suggestions include using a water clock design, a pendulum clock powered by a water wheel, or a container that maintains a constant water level with a regulated outflow. The overflow method involves keeping the inflow greater than the outflow to ensure a steady flow rate. Utilizing graduated cylinders and red solo cups can aid in measuring the water accurately. This approach offers a fun and practical solution for the STEM project.
Parker Hame
Messages
15
Reaction score
6
TL;DR Summary
I am doing a STEM project where we need to make a timer without any chemical reactions or electricity, and I think the best way to do this is to create a constant flow for a certain amount of time and weigh how much water comes out. What is the best way to create a constant flow of water for 10-300 seconds?
I am doing a STEM project where we need to make a timer without any chemical reactions or electricity, and I think the best way to do this is to create a constant flow for a certain amount of time and weigh how much water comes out. What is the best way to create a constant flow of water for 10-300 seconds?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Fun project. What are your thoughts so far?

I can think of one way to do it fairly accurately...
 
Google "water clock" there is an ancient and venerable tradition of designing clocks that use water. There are dozens and dozens of basic designs.
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron
anorlunda said:
Google "water clock" there is an ancient and venerable tradition of designing clocks that use water. There are dozens and dozens of basic designs.
The hard part about those is that I have no idea what the angle needs to be for it to work properly, or where to get a hollow cone.
 
berkeman said:
Fun project. What are your thoughts so far?

I can think of one way to do it fairly accurately...
I’m thinking maybe using a throttle type device and two tanks of water
 
Parker Hame said:
The hard part about those is that I have no idea what the angle needs to be for it to work properly, or where to get a hollow cone.
The cone was only one of many. Here's a simpler one.

1570827232084.png


And another.
1570827384201.png
 
Did anyone suggest a pendulum clock?
A saw blade (hacksaw) could be lowered tooth by tooth by an escapement attached to a fixed length pendulum, that repeats a cycle every second. The blade will fall out when the number of teeth initially engaged have passed down through the escapement. You would need a blade with over 300 teeth for 1 second accuracy.
 
Baluncore said:
Did anyone suggest a pendulum clock?
Yes, a pendulum clock powered by a water wheel instead of a weight on a string.
 
Does it have to be water.
Other options.
An egg timer perhaps.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hourglass
If water, one could set the faucet to drip, drip, drip, and do counting instead of weighing.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes Klystron and anorlunda
  • #10
Parker Hame said:
What is the best way to create a constant flow of water for 10-300 seconds?

One thought is to have a container where inflowing water at the top of the continer keeps it overflowing, so the water level is in the container is approximately constant. Near the bottom of the container, have an outlet pipe whose outflow is much less than the inflow at the top. The outflow would be driven by an approximately constant pressure.
 
  • Like
Likes anorlunda and Asymptotic
  • #11
Stephen Tashi said:
One thought is to have a container where inflowing water at the top of the continer keeps it overflowing, so the water level is in the container is approximately constant. Near the bottom of the container, have an outlet pipe whose outflow is much less than the inflow at the top. The outflow would be driven by an approximately constant pressure.
This idea sounds great! I think this is what we will do, red solo cups and graduated cylinders to the rescue!
 
  • Like
Likes anorlunda
  • #12
Stephen Tashi said:
Near the bottom of the container, have an outlet pipe whose outflow is much less than the inflow at the top.
The overflow only has to remain positive, it does not need to exceed the regulated outflow.
The reservoir could have a large surface area of water to reduce sensitivity to flow regulation.
 
Back
Top