How Can I Derive This Wave Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yungman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation
yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
294
Given a wave:
e(t)=\hat x E_{x0}\cos \omega t+\hat y E_{y0}\cos( \omega t+ \delta)(1)
The book claimed:
\sin^2\delta\;=\; \left[\frac {e_x(t)}{E_{x0}}\right]^2-2\left[\frac {e_x(t)}{E_{x0}}\right]\left[\frac {e_y(t)}{E_{y0}}\right]\cos\delta+ \left[\frac {e_y(t)}{E_{y0}}\right]^2
I can not get this. Below is my work.

From (1)
e_x(t)=E_{x0}\cos\omega t\;\Rightarrow \;\cos \omega t=\frac{e_x(t)}{E_{x0}}
\Rightarrow\; \sin\omega t\;=\;\sqrt{1-\left(\frac{e_x(t)}{E_{x0}}\right)^2}
e_y(t)=E_{y0}\cos(\omega t+\delta) \;\Rightarrow \;\frac{e_y(t)}{E_{y0}}\;=\;\cos\omega t \cos\delta-\sin\omega t sin\delta\;=\; \frac{e_x(t)}{E_{x0}}\cos\delta-\sqrt{1-\left(\frac{e_x(t)}{E_{x0}}\right)^2}sin\delta
\Rightarrow\;\sqrt{1-\left(\frac{e_x(t)}{E_{x0}}\right)^2}sin\delta \;=\; \frac{e_x(t)}{E_{x0}}\cos\delta-\frac{e_y(t)}{E_{y0}}
\Rightarrow\;\left(1-(\frac{e_x(t)}{E_{x0}})^2\right) sin^2\delta \;=\;\left[\frac{e_x(t)}{E_{x0}}\right]^2 \cos^2\delta-2\frac{e_x(t)}{E_{x0}}\frac{e_y(t)}{E_{y0}}\cos \delta + \left[\frac{e_y(t)}{E_{y0}}\right]^2
It is obvious that I am not going to get what the book gave:
\sin^2\delta\;=\; \left[\frac {e_x(t)}{E_{x0}}\right]^2-2\left[\frac {e_x(t)}{E_{x0}}\right]\left[\frac {e_y(t)}{E_{y0}}\right]\cos\delta+ \left[\frac {e_y(t)}{E_{y0}}\right]^2

Please help my derivation.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi yungman! :smile:

(i can't see where you've gone wrong, but try it this way …)

you are essentially asked to prove that cos2A + cos2B - 2cosAcosBcos(A-B) = sin2(A-B)

just expand that! :wink:

when you've done that, try drawing the diameter PQ of a unit circle, with two points A and B such that angleAPD = A, angle BPD = B, and using simple geometry to prove that AB = sin(A-B)
 
Thanks Tiny Tim, I'll try it and see.

You think you can look at the other questions I posted in page 3 of the "Classical Physics" on Balanis a few days ago, I have no luck at all.

Many thanks
 
Last edited:
Thanks Tiny Tim. I worked out using A=\omega t +\delta\;\hbox{ and }\; B=\omega t. This is a little tricky and unobvious.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top