How can I determine if a change of variables using the Jacobian is one to one?

Click For Summary
To determine if a change of variables using the Jacobian is one-to-one, it is essential to ensure that the Jacobian is injective and its determinant is non-zero. The discussion highlights the challenge of expressing variables x and y in terms of u and v, particularly when using transformations like u = sinhxcosy and v = coshxsiny. The relationship between the Jacobians, where the determinant of the inverse is the reciprocal of the original, is valid but requires careful consideration of the transformation's properties. To assess if the transformation is one-to-one, one might analyze the function graphically or use matrix methods to evaluate its kernel. Understanding these principles is crucial for successfully evaluating integrals with variable changes.
Benny
Messages
577
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have the following integral.

<br /> \int\limits_{}^{} {\int\limits_R^{} {\left( {\sinh ^2 x + \cos ^2 y} \right)} \sinh 2x\sin 2ydxdy} <br />

Where R is the part of the region 0 <= x, 0 <= y <= pi/2 bounded by the curves x = 0, y = 0, sinhxcosy = 1 and coshxsiny = 1.

In the hints section, there is a part which says J_{xy,uv} = \left( {\sinh ^2 x + \cos ^2 y} \right)^{ - 1}.

Firstly, to evaluate this integral I need to make a change of variables. The obvious ones are u = sinhxcosy and v = coshxsiny. Usually, to compute the Jacobian I would find expressions for x and y in terms of u and v. In this case this doesn't look possible.

The hint seems to have used \frac{{\partial \left( {x,y} \right)}}{{\partial \left( {u,v} \right)}} = \left[ {\frac{{\partial \left( {u,v} \right)}}{{\partial \left( {x,y} \right)}}} \right]^{ - 1}. I know this is valid for some cases but I'm not sure which ones. Can someone explain to me when I can use the Jacobian relation given above?

Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As long as it isn't 0! The Jacobian is the determinant of the transformation matrix. The determinant of A-1 is one over the determinant of A. The only problem you might have is that you will want the integral written in terms of the new variable u and v.
 
I don't really understand their notation with the Js but from my working, if u = sinhxcosy and v = coshxsiny then:

<br /> \frac{{\partial \left( {u,v} \right)}}{{\partial \left( {x,y} \right)}} = \sinh ^2 x + \cos ^2 y<br />

If I take \frac{{\partial \left( {x,y} \right)}}{{\partial \left( {u,v} \right)}} to be the reciprocal of the above then the integral is easy to evaluate.

I just had my doubts because in most of the solutions I've seen, the author has avoided using the above. Rather, an effort is always made to solve equations to get the new variables in terms of the original variables so that the Jacobian is calculated directly. Anyway thanks for the help.
 
In essence all you have to do is ensure that your Jacobian is injective (ie: one-to-one) and that its determinant is non-zero.
 
Ok, but sometimes it doesn't seem so easy to decide whether or not the transformation is one to one. For example in this question I used the substitution u = sinhxcosy.

To decide whether the transformation is one to one, is it like the on variable integral where you have something like u = x + 1, 0<=x<=2 and you determine whether that substitution (transformation) is one to one in terms of a graph. Or, do you need to take a matrix and use it's Kernel or something like that to determine whether the transformation is one to one?
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K