How can I determine if a change of variables using the Jacobian is one to one?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating a double integral involving hyperbolic and trigonometric functions, specifically focusing on the change of variables using the Jacobian. The original poster is attempting to understand when the Jacobian relation can be applied, particularly in cases where it may not be straightforward to express the original variables in terms of the new variables.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to compute the Jacobian for a transformation involving variables defined by hyperbolic and trigonometric functions. There are questions about the validity of using the inverse Jacobian relation without explicitly solving for the new variables in terms of the original ones. Some participants express uncertainty about determining if the transformation is one-to-one and explore different methods for assessing this.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, raising questions about the conditions under which the Jacobian can be used and discussing the implications of injectivity for the transformation. There is acknowledgment of the complexity involved in determining one-to-one transformations, with various perspectives being shared.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of specific constraints related to the region of integration and the transformations being considered, as well as the potential challenges in visualizing or calculating the Jacobian directly.

Benny
Messages
577
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have the following integral.

[tex] \int\limits_{}^{} {\int\limits_R^{} {\left( {\sinh ^2 x + \cos ^2 y} \right)} \sinh 2x\sin 2ydxdy} [/tex]

Where R is the part of the region 0 <= x, 0 <= y <= pi/2 bounded by the curves x = 0, y = 0, sinhxcosy = 1 and coshxsiny = 1.

In the hints section, there is a part which says [tex]J_{xy,uv} = \left( {\sinh ^2 x + \cos ^2 y} \right)^{ - 1}[/tex].

Firstly, to evaluate this integral I need to make a change of variables. The obvious ones are u = sinhxcosy and v = coshxsiny. Usually, to compute the Jacobian I would find expressions for x and y in terms of u and v. In this case this doesn't look possible.

The hint seems to have used [tex]\frac{{\partial \left( {x,y} \right)}}{{\partial \left( {u,v} \right)}} = \left[ {\frac{{\partial \left( {u,v} \right)}}{{\partial \left( {x,y} \right)}}} \right]^{ - 1}[/tex]. I know this is valid for some cases but I'm not sure which ones. Can someone explain to me when I can use the Jacobian relation given above?

Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As long as it isn't 0! The Jacobian is the determinant of the transformation matrix. The determinant of A-1 is one over the determinant of A. The only problem you might have is that you will want the integral written in terms of the new variable u and v.
 
I don't really understand their notation with the Js but from my working, if u = sinhxcosy and v = coshxsiny then:

[tex] \frac{{\partial \left( {u,v} \right)}}{{\partial \left( {x,y} \right)}} = \sinh ^2 x + \cos ^2 y[/tex]

If I take [tex]\frac{{\partial \left( {x,y} \right)}}{{\partial \left( {u,v} \right)}}[/tex] to be the reciprocal of the above then the integral is easy to evaluate.

I just had my doubts because in most of the solutions I've seen, the author has avoided using the above. Rather, an effort is always made to solve equations to get the new variables in terms of the original variables so that the Jacobian is calculated directly. Anyway thanks for the help.
 
In essence all you have to do is ensure that your Jacobian is injective (ie: one-to-one) and that its determinant is non-zero.
 
Ok, but sometimes it doesn't seem so easy to decide whether or not the transformation is one to one. For example in this question I used the substitution u = sinhxcosy.

To decide whether the transformation is one to one, is it like the on variable integral where you have something like u = x + 1, 0<=x<=2 and you determine whether that substitution (transformation) is one to one in terms of a graph. Or, do you need to take a matrix and use it's Kernel or something like that to determine whether the transformation is one to one?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K