How can I estimate the fatigue life of a component subjected to a rotating cam?

AI Thread Summary
To estimate the fatigue life of a cantilever component subjected to a rotating cam, first calculate the peak acceleration using the formula A = a(sqr w), where 'a' is the cam offset and 'w' is the rotation frequency. Next, determine the static stresses at the fixed end of the cantilever, including principal stress and maximum shear stress. To assess fatigue life, compare the alternating stress derived from the loading conditions to S-N diagrams specific to the material of the beam. This comparison will help identify whether the material's fatigue limit is exceeded. Following these steps will provide a clear pathway to estimate the component's fatigue life effectively.
chandran
Messages
137
Reaction score
1
I am working on a physics problem in a project to estimate fatigue life of a component.

There is a cam rotating with an offset of 10mm rotating at an rpm of 230. The component is a cantilever fixed at one end is getting hit by this cam while it is rotating. The cam is at the other end of cantilever.

I want to simulate this using basic mechanics to estimate the fatigue life of the component. So far i have done the following

1.peak acceleration due to the component is a(sqr w) where a is the cam offset and w is the frequency of rotation of cam. Call this peak acceleration as A

2.I have calculated the static stresses(principal stress(sigma) and maximum shear stress(tau)) at the cantilever point(fixed end) due to a load of P as sigma


After that how should i proceed to check the fatigue life?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
First thing you can do is to take your alternating stress and compare that to what can be found in S-n diagrams for the material your beam is made out of. That I would think would be the quickest and easiest. If your material has a fatigue limit, you will find it there.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top