How can I factor these polynomials?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cjackson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomials
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the process of factoring polynomials, specifically finding the greatest common factor (GCF) among terms. Participants explain that to find the GCF, one must identify the smallest power of each variable and break down numbers into their prime factors. Examples provided include finding the GCF of monomials and polynomials, emphasizing that the method remains consistent across different types of expressions. The conversation highlights that while specific examples can be addressed, a comprehensive understanding of polynomial factorization is beyond the scope of the forum. The thread concludes with a reminder that the book contains worked examples for further study.
cjackson
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
I'm in desperate need of help with factoring. Basically, how do you do it?

Below is an example of what I'm up against.

54c^2d^5e^3; 81d^3e^2

It wants me to find the greatest common factor.

http://www.rempub.com/80-activities-to-make-basic-algebra-easier

That is the book I'm working out of.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Notice that d and e are factors in common?
BTW: just checking - is that an actual example from the book or one you made up?
 
a^3=a\times a^2
So if you wanted to find the greatest common factor of a^2; a^3 then it would be a^2. Basically, if you have any a^n for n greater than 2, then the common factor will always be the one with the smallest power index, in this case 2.

m^3n^5; n^7m^2
In this case, the smallest index of the m's is 2, and the smallest of the n's is 5, hence the greatest common factor is m^2n^5.

For numbers, you need to break them up into their prime factors. For example,
12=4\times 3 = 2^2\times 3
and
90 = 9\times 10 = 3^2\times 2\times 5

This is the same problem as earlier with the variables, but now we just have numbers where variables would've otherwise been. It's the exact same procedure though, as long as you break the number into its prime factors.
So to find the great common factor of 12 and 90, we notice that the highest power of the 2's is 1 (hence just 2^1=2), the highest power of the 3's is 1, and 5 is only present in one of the numbers so no 5 common factor. Hence the answer is 2^1\times 3^1=2\times 3 = 6.
 
Simon Bridge said:
Notice that d and e are factors in common?
BTW: just checking - is that an actual example from the book or one you made up?
It's straight from the book.
 
How do I factor monomials, binomials, trinomials and quadratic equations?

Here are some more examples from the book.

24x^3y^2-20x^2y^2+16xy^2

x^2+5x+6

3y^2+8y+4
 
cjackson said:
How do I factor monomials, binomials, trinomials and quadratic equations?
General factorization of polynomials is too involved for us to attempt to answer it here in an online forum. Your book must show worked examples of each type. If you have a question about a particular step in a single factorization, we can help you with that, but our role here is not to teach you a broad topic in algebra or other area of mathematics.

Thread closed.
cjackson said:
Here are some more examples from the book.

24x^3y^2-20x^2y^2+16xy^2

x^2+5x+6

3y^2+8y+4
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top