How can I find the angle θ for mechanical equilibrium in this problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter caddyguy109
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanical
AI Thread Summary
To find the angle θ for mechanical equilibrium, it's essential to sum the forces in the x (Fx) and z (Fz) directions and calculate the moments around the intersection of the two normal forces (Na and Nb). The forces to consider include the weight (W) acting downward and the normal forces acting perpendicular to the slope. The moment should be calculated based on the geometry of the setup, particularly where the normal forces intersect. Understanding that moments are free vectors can help clarify the calculations needed for equilibrium. This problem is challenging for many students, indicating a common area of confusion in mechanics.
caddyguy109
Messages
129
Reaction score
0
This problem was part of a post in another thread, but it got really messy over there and no one seems to be responding.

So, here's the problem:
http://www.ihostphotos.com/show.php?id=182816"

And I was told this (but it didn't really help me see what to do, much):
"at least it's a 90 degree angle! and frictionless ...
try taking Moments around the place where the two F_N intersect
did you sum F_x and F_z first?"

But what forces do I sum for Fx and Fz? And where exactly is that total moment taken about?

On the FBD, I drew the W force pointing straight downward from the center, as specified, then Na (Normal Force A) perpendicular to the slope on the left, and did the same, but as Nb, on the right. This part makes sense, theoretically, to me at least.

But what the HECK do I add/calculate/find, etc. to get "the angle θ corresponding to equilibrium as a function of M, W, and I"? Still don't know what exactly to do or where to start, as far as finding that.:frown:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone??
 
This problem is REALLY driving me nuts...:mad:
 
:rolleyes: ...this problem really must be confusing. Seems to be the one all of us in the class are getting stuck on right now.
 
The moment is a free vector, unlike the forces that are sliding vectors, you have two normal forces acting on each of the ends of the rod. The advice given to you is a good one, but try checking sum of Fx, you might get suprised.
 
Okay, THINK I got it.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top