How can I find Vab in a circuit using Mesh Current Analysis?

AI Thread Summary
To find Vab in the circuit using Mesh Current Analysis, the user is advised to simplify the top loop and clarify the voltage assignments. The matrix provided represents the system of equations derived from the mesh currents, but the user needs to verify the initial loop equations to ensure accuracy. It's suggested to check the coefficients in the matrix, particularly for the last equation, which should reflect a value of -20. By applying Ohm's Law to the difference between the loop currents, the expected voltage of 10V can be confirmed. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly setting up the loop equations and validating the matrix formulation.
suspenc3
Messages
400
Reaction score
0
Hi I need to find Vab in the following circuit using Mesh Currents...Ive tried this a million times, I understand the method...but I am definitely doing something wrong. Whould I Simplify the top loop?...if its possible. I've been doing it as 3 loops, but i don't know what to use as a voltage for the top.

the file is attached,

Here is my matrix:\left( \begin{array}{ccc} 8 & -6 & -2\\-6 & 19 & -5\\-2 & -5 &7\end{array}\right) \left( \begin{array}{c} I_1\\I_2\\I_3\end{array}\right) = \left( \begin{array}{c} 28\\0\\20\end{array}\right)

V_{ab} is suppose to equal 10V...

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • ccts2.JPG
    ccts2.JPG
    6.9 KB · Views: 513
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume you have I1 in top loop, I2 in left loop, I3 in right loop, all going clockwise? Please show us your full initial equations so we can check how you got to the final matrix. Like, for the top loop you get:

8(I1) + 5(I1-I3) + 6(I1-I2) = 0

Right? What are the other two loop equations, and then show the steps to get to your matrix equation, and then show how you solved it with the determinant.
 
The way we were taught to do it was for the i1ji position in the matrix, you sum all the resistances in that loop. i2j2 is the same for that loop and i3j3 is the same for the 3rd loop. the i1j2 position is the resistances that are common to the 1st and second loop...etc..
 
Well, okay, but if it were me and I was getting the wrong answer, I'd do it the long way that I mentioned just to check my answer...
 
The last equation coefficient on the right side vector should be -20 based upon the equation you wrote for Loop 3. If you then take the difference between the 2 loop currents coupling the 2 Ohm resistor and use Ohm's Law you should get 10 Volts.
In your case this would be (i1-i3)2=10 Volts. i1 = 4 A; i2 = 1 A; i3 = -1 A
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top