How can I generalize the result for the n=2 case to a larger set of numbers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter maquina
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Set
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on generalizing the result for the case of n=2 to a larger set of numbers in an ordered field. The initial case shows that the ratio (a+c)/(b+d) remains between the minimum and maximum of a/b and c/d when b and d are positive. A suggestion is made to use proof by induction for the general case, with a reformulation of the n=2 case to highlight the convex combination of the ratios a_i/b_i. By demonstrating that the weighted averages of these ratios fall within the bounds set by the minimum and maximum, the generalization can be established. The conversation emphasizes the importance of recognizing the properties of ordered fields and convex combinations in the proof process.
maquina
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a,b,c,d in a ordered set K and b and d>0
Show that \frac{a+c}{b+d} stay between the minimum and max from \frac {a}{b} and \frac {c}{d}. Generalize for a_1,\hdots,a_n,b_1,\hdots,b_n \in K with b_1\hdots,b_n >0 so \frac{a_1+\hdots+a_n}{b_1+\hdots+b_n} is between the max and min elements from \frac{a_1}{b_1},\hdots,\frac{a_n}{b_n}

I could do it for the the first case but in a way it's impossible to generalize
any ideas?
tks in advance
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


to correct, it`s a ordered field
 
if u consider a/b<c/d
u can do a/b - (a+c)/(b+d)}=(ad-bc)/(b(b+d))>0
and c/d - (a+c)/(b+d)}=(bc-ad)/(b(b+d))>0
and done

but them using samething for generalizing i couldn't make it :(
 
Last edited:
Looks like proof by induction would work.
 
Let's redo the n=2 case in a way it will be easier to generalize. Write (a1+a2)/(b1+b2)=(b1/(b1+b2))*(a1/b1)+(b2/(b1+b2))*(a2/b2). Notice that the bi/(b1+b2) terms are positive and sum to 1. (This means (a1+a2)/(b1+b2) is in the 'convex hull' of the bi/ai.) If I replace the ai/bi by their minimum and maximum, what do I conclude?
 
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
Back
Top