How can I improve the free up and down mechanism for my weight sorting machine?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dsesmg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanism
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on improving the free up and down movement of a weight sorting machine's carrier, which is hindered by friction in the guide piston mechanism. The varying weight of the carriers and friction between the metal angle and PVC plate contribute to inaccurate weight readings. Suggestions include eliminating the PVC plate to reduce friction but raise concerns about preventing the carrier from spinning during operation. The user seeks advice on achieving smoother vertical motion for the guide piston while maintaining stability. Overall, the goal is to enhance performance without significantly increasing costs.
dsesmg
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am a hobbiest and I am trying to build a weight sorting machine that sorts out weight object according to their weight.
So, basically, there are carriers that are used for transporting weight object and I attached a guilde piston mechanism underneath the carrier so that the carrier could freely position itself on a loadcell(weight sensor) enabling the microcontroller to detect the most accurate weight readings as possible.
The design of the carrier is this.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/34955071@N02/3918540769/sizes/l/
And this is the actual carriers attached to sorting conveyor.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/34955071@N02/3736310225/sizes/l/
See that white things, that's the carriers.
The guide piston which attached to carrier looks like this.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/34955071@N02/4028566051/sizes/l/
And the guide piston mechanism is like this.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/34955071@N02/4028566073/sizes/l/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/34955071@N02/4028566079/sizes/l/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/34955071@N02/4028566081/sizes/l/

Here is the problem.
The weight of the carriers all vary because the guide piston mechanism I came up with has significant friction, causing the bad readings.
The guide piston will move only up and down. but the metal angle(yellow thing) in the picture makes friction with the PVC plate which is attached horizontally to guide piston(This prevents the guide piston not to rotate while attached to the carrier, otherwise, the carriers would spin during the conveyor moving)
If I increase the gap between the metal angle and the PVC plate, the carrier will tilt and this causes the carrier to contact with adjacent carrier. The guide piston also makes fricktion internally inside the cylinder. This friction varies.
I couldn't think of any way to simplify free up and down motion of the guide piston. Also, considering the cost aspect, the current guide piston mechanism was good. but considering the performance, it is bad.
Could please somebody advise me how to achieve the most smoothe and efficient method to make the carrier up and down freely?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I think I see what you have going on but there is one thing that isn't quite clear. What relation to the carrier does the grey PVC plate have? Does the carrier rest on the PVC plate to get the measurement?
 
Hi, the grey PVC plat is used to prevent the carrier not to spin during the conveyor moving. The piston assembled in the cylinder spins as there is no stopping mechanism in the cylinder. This causes the PVC to make contact with the metal angle. So, I better off eliminating this PVC plate anyway. Then, how can I stop the carrier from spinning...
 
I have Mass A being pulled vertically. I have Mass B on an incline that is pulling Mass A. There is a 2:1 pulley between them. The math I'm using is: FA = MA / 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If MB is greater then FA, it pulls FA up as MB moves down the incline. BUT... If I reverse the 2:1 pulley. Then the math changes to... FA = MA * 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If FA is greater then MB, it pulls MB up the incline as FA moves down. It's confusing...
Hi. I noticed that all electronic devices in my household that also tell time eventually lag behind, except the ones that get synchronized by radio signal or internet. Most of them are battery-powered, except my alarm clock (which runs slow as well). Why does none of them run too fast? Deliberate design (why)? Wrong temperature for quartz crystal? Decreasing battery voltage? Or just a coincidence?
Back
Top