How can I measure the TE TM splitting in Microcavities?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Martin91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measure Splitting
AI Thread Summary
To measure the TE-TM splitting in microcavities, polarized light is essential, and using a half-wave plate can help rotate the polarization. The TE and TM modes are defined by the orientation of the electric and magnetic fields relative to the microcavity plane, with splitting varying based on the angle of incidence. Angle-resolved reflection or transmission measurements can reveal the energy dispersion, and adjustments may be necessary to optimize detection. A linear polarizer followed by a half-wave plate is recommended, but the spectral resolution and angular scanning capabilities of the detection system are critical for observing small shifts. The TE-TM splitting is typically minor, often in the range of a few hundred microelectronvolts.
Martin91
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
HI all,

I think I have to use some combination of waveplates on the signal, but I am not sure, does anybody know this?

Thanks for help
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Are you looking at a planar microcavity or is it a structured one, e.g. a micropillar?

Generally speaking, the TE and TM modes are the linear polarizations with either the electric or the magnetic field oriented perpendicular to the plane given by the normal vector of the microcavity plane and the wave vector of the light field. Therefore, the TE-TM splitting will obviously be slightly different for each value of k along the dispersion and it is 0 for normal incidence.

So you need polarized light and a half wave plate to rotate the polarization of the light field. One possible way to do this is to perform angle-resolved reflection or transmission measurements using polarized white light. If you do not know, at which angle you need to put the half wave plates, just rotate them until you find the lowest and highest energies for some given angle. These should appear at orthogonal angles. The splitting is, however, usually not large. Depending on the material, it may be a feww 100 microeV, though.
 
  • Like
Likes Martin91
thanks a lot for your answer, basically I just put a lambda half plate in my excitation path and find the highest/lowest energy dispersion on higher k vectors yes? and nothing in my signal path ?

in my case it is a 1 dimensional ridge GaAs
 
Martin91 said:
thanks a lot for your answer, basically I just put a lambda half plate in my excitation path and find the highest/lowest energy dispersion on higher k vectors yes? and nothing in my signal path ?

Well, if you already have polarized light, you just put a lambda half plate. Otherwise, you need to place a Glan or some other polarizer in your beam path first of course. What kind of light source will you use? Will you measure in transmission or reflection?

For details on one example system, see G. Panzarini et al., Phys. Rev. B 59, 5082 (1999) and ref. 21 therein.
 
thanks for your help so far, is in reflection and a continuous laser, I put a linear polarizer and after it a lambda half plate rotated it, but the dispersion relation did not change, I am not sure if I also have to put something in the detection path?
 
This may be difficult. What is the spectral resolution of your detector? What is the resolution with which you can scan the angle of incidence of the light beam? What is the angular width of the beam? The shift you try to see might be very small and it will be 0 at normal incidence.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top