How Can I Navigate the Complexities of Chaos and Randomness?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Poursoi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chaos Randomness
AI Thread Summary
Navigating chaos and randomness can be challenging, especially when seeking direction for a project. Suggestions include constructing and studying the dynamics of a double pendulum, which exemplifies chaotic behavior. Exploring nonlinear systems and circuits that exhibit chaos is also recommended. Engaging with resources in physics forums can provide additional insights and discussions on the topic. Focusing on specific goals within the project will help streamline the research process.
Poursoi
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I started a project looking at chaos and randomness recently but i am having a hard time finding direction.
I would really appreciate any pointers and suggestions.

So far i have done the background definitions and descriptions, i have also looked at fractal geometry.

thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what is your goal with this project? other than looking at chaos and randomness what do you want to achieve?
 
How about constructing and studying the dynamics of a double pendulum?
 
Tide said:
How about constructing and studying the dynamics of a double pendulum?
I have heard from some of my friends in another school that they are also trying to handle the coordinates x0y with complex multivariables.
 
Many (relatively) simple circuits can also be constructed that exhibit chaotic behavior. Search for "nonlinear" or something like that in the general physics forum, I posted there on this topic a couple weeks back.
 
  • Like
Likes student-engineer
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
578
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top