How can I prove that f + g is convex?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mohdhm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Proofs
mohdhm
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
hey everyone:

Use a definition to work forward from each of the following statements.

b. for functions f anf g the function f + g is convex, where f + g is the function whoes value at any point x is f(x) + g(x).

Definition of a convex function: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convex_function (the equation)

So guys, I'm really stumped, what are we asked to do here. I have a hunch that we have to add g(x) of a convex function to the f(x) of one, but we only have the function of f to work with, and also in the definition we get a y variable, that was not even mentioned in the question... what is up with that. If someone can at least guide me in the right direction, i'd be eternally grateful
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No wonder you are stumped! The "theorem" as you state it is false. Did you not include the condition that f(x) and g(x) are convex themselves?

I have absolutely no idea what you mean by "g(x) of a convex function"- either g(x) itself is a convex function or it is not, but there is no "g(x) of a convex function".

A function is convex if and only if, for x and y any two points in its domain, tf(x)+ (1-t)f(y)\ge f(tx+ (1-t)y). In other words, the straight line between (x,f(x)) and (y, f(y)) is above the point on the graph (tx+ (1-t)y, f(tx+ (1-t)y)).

Okay, if the function is f(x)+ g(y) that means you want to prove that
t(f(x)+ g(x))+ (1-t)(f(y)+ g(y))\ge f(tx+ (1-t)y)+ g(tx+ (1-t)y
and you can assume that is true of f(x) and g(x) separately. Looks like straightforward algebra to me.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top