How Can I Simplify a Quadratic Equation with Rationals?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Caldus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quadratic
Caldus
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
Trying to rewrite a quadratic equation in the form a(x - h)^2 + k. The equation I'm trying to rewrite is:

y = x^2 + 3x + 5/2

Not looking for an answer, just looking for how to do this (I don't know how to do it if it has rationals in it). Thank you.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Complete the square.
x2+3x +k=(x+3/2)2
What is k?

Also, you can multiply through by two to get rid of the rationals, but don't forget to divide it out at the end.
 
Last edited:
IOW you do it the same as if there weren't rationals.
 
Originally posted by StephenPrivitera
x2+3x +k=(x+3/2)2
I am sorry, but, how are those two equal ? and how are they connected to the original question ?

To convert a quadratic to the form (a(x-h)^2 + k) you must (as StephenPrivitera said) complete the square.
If you have a quadratic on the form of :
ax^2 + bx + c
Then, it is a complete square if c=(b/2)^2
So, to turn any quadratic to a complete square you need to make (c) in it equal to ((b/2)^2)
In your case, (b/2)^2 = (3/2)^2 = 9/4
To turn 5/2 into 9/4, you will need to add ((9/4)-(5/2)=(9/4)-(10/4)=-(1/4)) to it. But if you add any number to the quadratic you will actually change its value. So, to maintain the value, you will subtract the same number again, therefore leaving the qudratic unchanged (adding and subtracting the same number is like adding 0, it does nothing to the quadratic).
Here you go:
y = x^2 + 3x + 5/2
y = x^2 + 3x + 5/2 + 0
y = x^2 + 3x + 5/2 - 1/4 + 1/4
y = x^2 + 3x + (5/2 - 1/4) + 1/4
y = x^2 + 3x + (10/4 - 1/4) + 1/4
y = x^2 + 3x + 9/4 + 1/4
y = (x^2 + 3x + 9/4) + 1/4
y = ((x + 3/2)*(x + 3/2)) + 1/4
y = (x + 3/2)^2 + 1/4

Which is on the form that you asked for :smile:.
 
I am sorry, but, how are those two equal ? and how are they connected to the original question ?


Notice that you proved:

x^2 + 3x + 5/2 = (x + 3/2)^2 + 1/4

Do a little rearrangement and you'll see that's (essentially) of the form

x^2+3x +k=(x+3/2)^2
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top