How Can I Solve for Tau in These Two Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mugged
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To solve for tau in the equations V1 = Vf(1-e^(-t1/tau)) and V2 = Vf(1-e^(-t2/tau)), one can rearrange each equation to express tau in terms of the other variables. The derived expressions for tau are tau = -t1/ln[1 - (V1/Vf)] and tau = -t2/ln[1 - (V2/Vf)]. By equating these two expressions, a relationship among V1, V2, t1, and t2 emerges, indicating they cannot all be independent variables. The discussion highlights the need to manipulate the equations to express tau in terms of all five variables. Ultimately, the user successfully found a method to express tau using all variables involved.
Mugged
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
I have these two equations:

V1 = Vf(1-e^(-t1/tau)) and V2 = Vf=(1-e^(-t2/tau))

I need to solve for tau in terms of t1, t2, Vf, V1, and V2 but i can't seem to find a proper way to combine these equations.

can you help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can solve each equation individually for tau. Then, since the results must be equal, you can equate them. This will give you a relationship between V1, t1, and V2, t2.

Example of solving one of the equations:

V_1 = V_f (1 - e^{-t_1 / \tau} )​

Divide both sides by Vf:

\frac{V_1}{V_f} = 1 - e^{-t_1 / \tau}​

Subtract V1 / Vf from both sides. Then add the exponential term to both sides (in other words, rearrange the terms):

e^{-t_1 / \tau} = 1 - \frac{V_1}{V_f}​

Take the natural logarithm of both sides of the equation:

-\frac{t_1}{\tau} = \ln \left[1 - \frac{V_1}{V_f} \right]​

Solve for tau by multiplying both sides by tau and then dividing both sides by the ln term (in other words, cross-multiply):

\tau = -\frac{t_1}{\ln \left[1 - \frac{V_1}{V_f} \right]}​

Now, when you solve the second equation for tau, you'll get a similar answer in terms of V2 and t2. Since it must be true that tau = tau, you can equate these results.
 
erm, thanks, but i need tau in terms of all 5 variables, not just 3.

I shouldve made that clear; not hard to solve for tau using just 1 equation actually...
 
Mugged said:
erm, thanks, but i need tau in terms of all 5 variables, not just 3.

I shouldve made that clear; not hard to solve for tau using just 1 equation actually...

Yeah, I know that. You should have read my post more closely. Do you agree with me, that using the exact same algebraic steps described in my first post, but applying them to the second equation (for V2), we will arrive at the following expression for tau?

\tau = -\frac{t_2}{\ln \left[1 - \frac{V_2}{V_f} \right]}​

If so, then it must be true that:

\tau = -\frac{t_2}{\ln \left[1 - \frac{V_2}{V_f} \right]} = -\frac{t_1}{\ln \left[1 - \frac{V_1}{V_f} \right]}​

EDIT: So basically V2, t2, V1, t1, can't all be independent variables. The equation above illustrates that they must be related to each other.
 
Last edited:
yeah that's mathematically correct no doubt...but definitely not what i asked.

actually i already solved it myself just now. if you solve for the e pieces and divide one over the other, you can solve for tau in terms of all variables.

thanks though ceph
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top