How Can I Solve This Compound Harmonic Motion Problem with Different Methods?

AI Thread Summary
To solve the compound harmonic motion problem, the initial conditions provided are crucial for determining the equations of motion for y1(t) and y2(t). Various methods can be employed, including Laplace transformations and solving differential equations, which all yield the same results. It's important to establish the correct equations of motion based on the forces acting on the masses, while considering the effects of the springs. The discussion emphasizes the need to find non-trivial solutions for the coefficients a and b by equating the determinant of the linear system to zero, leading to two values for ω². Ultimately, the correct approach hinges on accurately applying the initial conditions and solving the resulting equations.
mrzvengeance
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Spring.jpg


Determine the motion of this mechanical system satisfying the initial conditions :-
y1(0) = 1
y2(0) = 2
y1'(0) = -2*sqrt(6)
y2'(0) = sqrt(6)

Hint : there are 4 different methods you can use to solve this problem. They all give the same exact result.

I need to know what y1(t) and y2(t) are, please

Homework Equations


I know the shm equations- are they valid here?

The Attempt at a Solution



total k = 1/(1/k1+1/k2)

total m = m1 + m2

Help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could start with a free body diagram for each mass and the corresponding equations.
 
Hmm do I need a diagram to solve?
 
Strictly speaking no, but it usually helps. What you need is all the forces on each mass.
 
Any ideas?
 
Some ideas have been given. But we are not seeing any effort on your part.
 
I got another help from a friend, here is what he told me...

The calculations in your way will be rather long so I use the Laplace transformations. Are you familiar with that?
The first and best is Laplace. The second, long one, is to add different sin AND cos curves. The first approach is to give the y1- and y2-equations right. Your approach is wrong. Then put the initial conditions right. One is wrong for you. Then determine w.
When you done that one can write the curves in a graph. I have done that in my solution to control my equations solution. As you suggest you can do it any way if you have the initial conditions right (I believe).
This is a really hard problem for one who is not familiar and the Laplace as a working tool.

I am not familiar with Laplace. Are you? Here is my idea...

Upper mass:
Upper mass, upward spring force -> -k1*y1 = -3*y1
upper mass, downward spring force -> k2*(y2-y1) = 2*(y2-y1)
the change in length of the upper spring is y1, and in the lower spring is y2 - y1
Eq1 --> y1" = -5*y1 + 2*y2
Eq2 --> y2" = 2*y1 - 2*y2

I think the solutions may be

1. Reduction to a fourth-order differential equation.
2. Triangularization using operators.3. Substitution of Y(t) = X*exp(wt).3. Substitution of Y(t) = X*exp(wt).
4. Diagonalization.
 
Last edited:
Any ideas?
 
I am sorry, somehow I missed your previous message. Your method is essentially correct, but you forget there is also gravity.
 
  • #10
I am told gravity pulls on the weights to start the springs moving, but you don't need to deal with gravity in the calculations.
 
  • #11
Do you mean that ##y_1## and ##y_2## are measured from the equilibrium condition?
 
  • #12
voko said:
Do you mean that ##y_1## and ##y_2## are measured from the equilibrium condition?

ideal springs, point masses cannot collide, y1 and y2 are the distances of the bottom end of the springs from the top, so that the length of the second spring is y2-y1. As for gravitational effects, gravity pulls on the weights to start the springs moving, but you don't need to deal with gravity in your calculations.
 
  • #13
This statement: "gravity pulls on the weights to start the springs moving, but you don't need to deal with gravity in your calculations" does not make a whole lot of sense. Still, if you are told to ignore gravity, then you all you need to do is solve your equations.
 
  • #14
voko said:
This statement: "gravity pulls on the weights to start the springs moving, but you don't need to deal with gravity in your calculations" does not make a whole lot of sense. Still, if you are told to ignore gravity, then you all you need to do is solve your equations.

Thats where I need the help :)
 
  • #15
You listed four methods. Surely at least one of them should work.
 
  • #16
That's the problem of where I'm stuck. Help a brother out?
 
  • #17
Since you already know that the system will be undergoing harmonic motion, you can let ##y_1 = a \sin \omega t, y_2 = b \sin \omega t ##, and solve for ##a##, ##b## and ##\omega##. There will be two values for ##\omega##, and for each one, a pair of ##a## and ##b##. So you will have $$ (y_1^{(1)}, y_2^{(1)}) = (a_1 \sin \omega_1 t, b_1 \sin \omega_1 t) $$ and $$ (y_1^{(2)}, y_2^{(2)}) = (a_2 \sin \omega_2 t, b_2 \sin \omega_2 t) $$ The general solution is then $$ A (y_1^{(1)}, y_2^{(1)}) + B (y_1^{(2)}, y_2^{(2)}) $$
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #18
The only question remaining is how the heck do I solve for a, b, w1 and w2?
 
  • #19
You should obtain a system of to equations linear in ##a## and ##b##. Two coefficients of the linear system will depend on ##\omega^2##. The system will have the trivial solution ##a = b = 0##. You need to find a non-trivial solution. For that, you must equate the determinant of the system with zero, that will give you an equation for ##\omega^2##. Solve it, you will end up with two values for ##\omega^2##. Then substitute each one into the system and obtain ##a## and ##b##.
 
  • #20
A(y(1)1,y(1)2)+B(y(2)1,y(2)2) is what we have...so a and b must equal 0? I should be able to plug ANY numbers into each a and b and be able to have them equal correct? Or is there a correct way to do this...?
 
Back
Top