How Can I Solve This Dynamics Problem Involving Friction and Inclined Planes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JakePearson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dynamics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a dynamics problem involving an object moving up an inclined plane with friction. The user struggles with deriving the stopping distance equation, specifically d = u² / (2g(sinθ + μcosθ)). Participants suggest two approaches: using dynamics to analyze forces and acceleration, or applying conservation of energy to account for energy lost due to friction. The importance of showing work for better assistance is emphasized, as it allows others to provide targeted help. Overall, the thread highlights the challenges faced by students in understanding complex physics concepts and the collaborative effort to clarify these topics.
JakePearson
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
hey guys, I'm in the middle for revising for a dynamics paper in January. I'm in the middle of a 1st year BSc Physics degree. Looking through some past papers, there are questions that i can do, and there are questions that i am unable to do. These are usually question where you have to derive. I am going to write down one of the questions that are causing me problems and i was wondering if you could help me on how to answer it.

Q. An object moving along a horizontal surface reaches the foot of a plane inclined at an angle \vartheta to the horizontal with a speed u. If the coefficient of friction between the object and the plane is \mu show that the object will come to rest a distance d up the plane where
d = u2 / 2g (sin\vartheta) + \mucos\vartheta​


I am a diagnosed dyslexic, not using it as an excuse, i will always try my best, but this is not sinking in, can you please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We have to calculate the net retardation.

If you have the mass of the body and it's initial velocity, you can calculate it's rate of retardation (which will be a function of the friction and gravity) and finally the time/distance at which v = 0.


Now...you got to manipulate the equation that comes to the proof.
 
i can appreciate you comment. But this is what i mean. This isn't sinking in. My lectures speak to me like this. Could you work through it with me. Cheers
 
Imagine I give you a similar problem but without an incline...just one dimensional linear motion. So in this problem you have an initial velocity u and a constant deceleration -a...derive an equation for me predicting the stopping distance in terms of just those two variables. Your problem uses the same basic derivation, but now you need to figure out what -a is in your problem.
 
JakePearson said:
Q. An object moving along a horizontal surface reaches the foot of a plane inclined at an angle \vartheta to the horizontal with a speed u. If the coefficient of friction between the object and the plane is \mu show that the object will come to rest a distance d up the plane where
d = u2 / 2g (sin\vartheta) + \mucos\vartheta​
Be careful with parentheses. The answer should be:
d = u2/2g(sinθ + μcosθ)

There are two ways to approach this problem:
(1) Using straight dynamics. Hint: What forces act on the object? What's is its acceleration as it goes up the ramp? Use kinematics.
(2) Using conservation of energy. Hint: How much energy is 'lost' due to friction?

Pick one of those approaches and give it a shot. Show your work and you'll get plenty of help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top