How can I strengthen my PhD program application as a theoretical physicist?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bjnartowt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Research Year
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges faced by a master's student in physics who is preparing to apply for PhD programs but lacks published research. The student recognizes the competitive nature of theoretical physics and believes that having a publication would strengthen their application. They consider taking additional time to publish research before applying, citing benefits such as improved research skills, more study time for the Physics GRE, and the ability to live affordably at home. However, several potential downsides are noted, including the lack of supervision, the need for self-discipline, access to library resources, and the risk of not achieving publication after an additional year. Suggestions include applying to PhD programs regardless of publication status and focusing on maximizing grades and GRE preparation. The importance of gaining research experience, even if it doesn't lead to publication, is emphasized, with the possibility of submitting a conference abstract as an alternative.
bjnartowt
Messages
265
Reaction score
3
Hi all, I'm in an M.S. physics program, and am about to graduate May 2011. I do not have anything published yet, despite a summer's worth of research (which was very slow-going!). I want to be a theoretical physicist... a competitive field. So: I need extra time to publish something ebfore I go knocking on the doors of PhD programs. If I have hard results "published and out there", PhD programs are going to take my application much more seriously. I know publication is not a prerequisite for application, but 1) to "get good" at research seems to me will make the PhD experience a little easier 2) I will have more time to study for the Physics GRE 3) I can live cheaply at my parents house, so why not?

Are there any downsides to the plan I am rosily-describing right here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The disadvantages I see to this are:

1. It's unsupervised, which means you will not have access to guidance you need when, for example you submit something and the referees come back with pages of comments and you need to know what's important.

1b. If you have a friendly professor who says he or she will still help you, that's fine, but remember, if you're not a student, you go straight to the bottom of the priority list.

2. Without regular meetings, working from home, you need to be extremely self-disciplined to stay on track.

3. Have you thought about library access? How are you going to read the journals you need to reference?

4. What happens if you go through an additional year and still have no publication?

I might recommend applying to PhD programs next summer anyway. If you get into the place you want to go, why waste a year?
 
Is there ANY way to beef up my application to a PhD program? I'm going to try and take the Physics GRE, and do well in the rest of my classes, and my summer-research. But surely there's more I can do? I just want to go to a school that will train me really hard to do research and handle the publishing process, and which has advanced (beyond core) classes in supercondutvitiy theory...
 
I think you need to rethink this plan.

Let's look at it objectively - you described a summer of supervised research as "slow-going", so your plan is to extend this to a whole year, drop the supervision, and have an original contribution to human knowledge at the end?
 
bjnartowt said:
Is there ANY way to beef up my application to a PhD program? I'm going to try and take the Physics GRE, and do well in the rest of my classes, and my summer-research. But surely there's more I can do? I just want to go to a school that will train me really hard to do research and handle the publishing process, and which has advanced (beyond core) classes in supercondutvitiy theory...

I'm not sure what you're looking for here. There's no secret back door. Maximize your grades - particularly in the more advanced classes. Prepare as much as you can for the GRE. And you already have some research experience, so try to do as good a job at that as you can. If it doesn't result in a journal publication, you could try to get a conference abstract out of it.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top