How can i use kinematic equations to solve this problem?

AI Thread Summary
To determine how long the stone will be in the air after being thrown upward at 30 m/s from a 40 m tall tower, the kinematic equations can be applied. The acceleration due to gravity is -9.81 m/s², leading to the velocity equation of the stone as 30 - 9.81t m/s. The height of the stone can be expressed as 40 + 30t - (4.905)t². Setting the height equation to zero allows for solving a quadratic equation for time, which will yield two roots, one of which is negative and not physically meaningful. The relevant positive root will indicate the total time the stone is in the air before hitting the ground.
kevin112996
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,
This is my first post so I am sorry if this is in the wrong section. I am currently in a rush to finish my homework. I have tried working on it for several hours but I still cannot figure it out.
I am mainly trying to figure out how long the object will be in the air.

A stone is thrown upward at a speed of 30m/s off the edge of a 40m tall tower.

1. How can I find the velocity of the stone versus time. The time is suppose to start at 0 and go up increments of 0.3 sec from when the stone is thrown to the time the stone hits the ground.

Here are the equations I used: Final Velocity = Initial Velocity + Acceleration x Time
Distance = Initial Velocity x Time + 0.5 x Acceleration x Time^2
Final Velocity^2 = Initial Velocity^2 + 2 x Acceleration x Distance

I will have to graph this but I need to know how to find all the data first. Thank you for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The accelaration is -g= -9.81 m/s^2 so the speed, after t seconds, is 30- 9.81t m/s. It's height will be 40+ 30t- (9.81/2)t^2 above the ground. Set that equal to 0 and solve for t. That is a quadratic equation and will have two roots, one of which is negative. That would be the time it was on the ground if you had thrown it up fast enough that it was still going at 30 m/s when it got 40 m above the ground.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top