How can low energy light be detected if it's too weak to knock out an electron?

AI Thread Summary
Low energy light, such as long wavelength light, cannot knock out electrons, leading to questions about its detection and existence. Scientists detect low energy light through indirect methods, such as measuring its effects on materials or using sensitive instruments that can capture its presence. The discussion also touches on how radio technology operates, where electromagnetic waves induce currents in metals, causing electrons to move and generate sound. The interaction of light with materials can lead to energy loss through thermal motion, contributing to resistance in metals. Ultimately, interstellar telescopes function similarly to radio antennas, converting electromagnetic signals into visual information.
Jarfi
Messages
384
Reaction score
12
A long wavelength light has too little energy to knock out electrons, so how do scinetists detect them? and how does a light with low energy ever cease to exist since it can never be absorbed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jarfi said:
A long wavelength light has too little energy to knock out electrons, so how do scinetists detect them? and how does a light with low energy ever cease to exist since it can never be absorbed?

Do you know how a radio works?
 
DrDu said:
Do you know how a radio works?

I have taken a look at it, but don't fully get it, something about the magnetic field of the wave pushing current..but then I just thought, to push a current is kind of like knocking out electrons, since they are jumping from their atoms.

oh but to push a current the wave needs to behave like a wave and interact with its magnetic field with the metal atoms, without collapsing, but waves interacting behave as particles? now I'm just more and more confused.
 
The wave accelerates the electrons in a metal due to their electric field, i.e. electric currents are induced. The electrons in a metal are not bound to any specific ions but can move freely. However the accelerated electrons can also scatter from the atomic cores and thus loose the energy they received from the electric field creating thermal motion of the atoms, i.e. heat. That's the reason for the resistance of metals.
In a radio, basically the currents induced are used to move the membrane of the loud speakers. This also diminishes the current as the energy of the currents is converted into sound waves.
 
DrDu said:
The wave accelerates the electrons in a metal due to their electric field, i.e. electric currents are induced. The electrons in a metal are not bound to any specific ions but can move freely. However the accelerated electrons can also scatter from the atomic cores and thus loose the energy they received from the electric field creating thermal motion of the atoms, i.e. heat. That's the reason for the resistance of metals.
In a radio, basically the currents induced are used to move the membrane of the loud speakers. This also diminishes the current as the energy of the currents is converted into sound waves.

so the interstellar telescopes are basically just giant radio-antennas who turn the information into pictures.
 
Jarfi said:
so the interstellar telescopes are basically just giant radio-antennas who turn the information into pictures.

Yep.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top