How Can Maxwell's Equations Be Derived Using the Euler-Lagrange Equation?

neu
Messages
228
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


I'm asked to get Maxwell's equations using the Euler-lagrange equation:

\partial\left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial\left\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu}\right)}\right)-\frac{\partial L}{\partial A_{\nu}}=0

with the EM Langrangian density:

L=-\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}-j_{\mu}A^{\mu}

where the electromagnetic field tensor is:

F^{\mu\nu}=\partial^{\mu}A^{\nu}-\partial^{\nu}A^{\mu}

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm able to multiply out the density with the full form of the tensor F to get:

\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{2}\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu}\left(\partial^{\mu}A^{\nu}-\partial^{\nu}A^{\mu}\right)=\frac{1}{2}\left(\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu}F^{\mu\nu}\right)

My problem is that I know that the derivative w.r.t the scalar potential A for the 1st term in the density is zero as it only contains derivatives. i.e

\frac{\partial }{\partial A_{\mu}}\left(\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu}\partial^{\mu}A^{\nu}-\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu}\partial^{\nu}A^{\mu}\right)=0

But I'm unable to show it explicity
 
Physics news on Phys.org
neu said:

Homework Statement


I'm asked to get Maxwell's equations using the Euler-lagrange equation:

\partial\left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial\left\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu}\right)}\right)-\frac{\partial L}{\partial A_{\nu}}=0

with the EM Langrangian density:

L=-\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}-j_{\mu}A^{\mu}

where the electromagnetic field tensor is:

F^{\mu\nu}=\partial^{\mu}A^{\nu}-\partial^{\nu}A^{\mu}

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm able to multiply out the density with the full form of the tensor F to get:

\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{2}\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu}\left(\partial^{\mu}A^{\nu}-\partial^{\nu}A^{\mu}\right)=\frac{1}{2}\left(\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu}F^{\mu\nu}\right)

My problem is that I know that the derivative w.r.t the scalar potential A for the 1st term in the density is zero as it only contains derivatives. i.e

\frac{\partial }{\partial A_{\mu}}\left(\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu}\partial^{\mu}A^{\nu}-\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu}\partial^{\nu}A^{\mu}\right)=0

But I'm unable to show it explicity

I am not sure what you mean by "explicitly". As in other applications of the Lagrange formulation, you must treat A_\mu and \partial_\nu A_\mu independent quantities. So the derivative you wrote is trivially zero.
 
Thank you, that's very helpful.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top