How can molecules be designed to respond to radio signals?

  • Thread starter Thread starter arman4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Molecule
AI Thread Summary
Designing a molecule that can rearrange in response to electromagnetic signals, particularly non-visible and radio frequencies, presents significant challenges. The primary issues include the size of the wavelengths, which are much larger than typical molecules and biological cells, and the thermal fluctuations at lower frequencies that can disrupt molecular arrangements unless the molecules are cooled to near absolute zero. While nature has evolved temperature-sensitive sensory components in organisms, such as the heat detection in pit vipers, these mechanisms rely on heat sensing rather than direct molecular reconfiguration. The idea that moths might detect pheromones through infrared colors has largely been dismissed due to similar thermal equilibrium concerns.
arman4
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I'm wondering if its possible to design a molecule that re-arrange on an electromagnetic (non-visible and radio) signal, and revert back to original structure when signal stops.

Thanks in advance
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Two problems with this.
Firstly you're talking about wavelengths orders of magnitude larger than typical molecules and even whole biological cells.

Secondly at these lower frequencies you are near or below the peak freq. for thermal spectrum at conventional temperatures so unless the molecule is cooled down near single digit Kelvin temperatures, the background thermal fluctuations will randomize any arrangements you're considering.

Likely what is possible has been evolved in nature. (... pause for google searches...)

Consider the temperature sensitive sensory components of many organisms. Your sense of tactile warmth and more selectively a pit viper's heat "vision" must involve protein reconfigurations at the sensor cells. However this is not a direct effect but rather the infrared produces heat which is sensed. [See:http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v464/n7291/abs/nature08943.html" ]

Phillip S. Callahan suggested moths may detect pheromones from their infrared "colors" but this has pretty much been discounted by the very argument I gave with regard to thermal equilibrium issues. [see: http://www.jstor.org/pss/76364"]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top