How Can R_{00} Be Expressed Using Initial Data in General Relativity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhyPsy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Initial
PhyPsy
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that R_{00}= -\frac{1}{2}g^{\alpha\beta}g_{\alpha\beta,00}+ M_{00}, where M can be expressed solely in terms of the initial data, which is the metric tensor and its first derivatives.


Homework Equations


R_{ab}= R^c_{acb}= \Gamma^a_{bd,c}- \Gamma^a_{bc,d} in geodesic coordinates
\Gamma^a_{bc}= \frac{1}{2}g^{ad}(g_{dc,b}+ g_{db,c}- g_{bc,d})

The Attempt at a Solution


R_{00}= R^a_{0a0}= \Gamma^a_{00,a}- \Gamma^a_{0a,0}
R_{00}= (g_{b0,0}- \frac{1}{2}g_{00,b})g^{ab}_{,a}+ g^{ab}g_{b0,a0}- \frac{1}{2}g^{ab}g_{00,ab}- \frac{1}{2}(g_{ba,0}+ g_{b0,a}- g_0a,b)g^{ab}_{,0}- \frac{1}{2}g^{ab}g_{ba,00}- \frac{1}{2}g^{ab}g_{b0,0a}+ \frac{1}{2}g^{ab}g_{0a,0b}
a and b are summations from 0 to 3, while \alpha and \beta are summations for space coordinates, so they are 1 to 3. Since the one second-derivative term in the expression I am trying to reach is summed over the space coordinates, I need to split one of the terms above. I split -\frac{1}{2}g^{ab}g_{ba,00}= -\frac{1}{2}(g^{\alpha\beta}g_{\beta\alpha,00}+ g^{a0}g_{0a,00}+ g^{0\beta}g_{\beta0,00}).
So I define M_{00}= (g_{b0,0}- \frac{1}{2}g_{00,b})g^{ab}_{,a}- \frac{1}{2}(g_{ba,0}+ g_{b0,a}- g_0a,b)g^{ab}_{,0}, as all the rest of the terms have second derivatives of the metric tensor, which are not in the initial data.
R_{00}= -\frac{1}{2}(g^{\alpha\beta}g_{\beta\alpha,00}+ g^{a0}g_{0a,00}+ g^{0\beta}g_{\beta0,00}- g^{ab}g_{b0,a0}+ g^{ab}g_{00,ab}- g^{ab}g_{0a,0b})+ M_{00}
So now I have to show that -\frac{1}{2}(g^{a0}g_{0a,00}+ g^{0\beta}g_{\beta0,00}- g^{ab}g_{b0,a0}+ g^{ab}g_{00,ab}- g^{ab}g_{0a,0b})=0
I have simplified those five terms down to three: \frac{1}{2}(g^{a\beta}g_{0a,0\beta}- g^{a\beta}g_{00,a\beta}+ g^{\alpha\beta}g_{\beta0,\alpha0})
I do not know how to simplify that any further. Can someone help?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I've got it simplified to R_{00}= -\frac{1}{2}(g^{\alpha\beta}g_{\beta\alpha,00}- g^{\alpha\beta}g_{0\alpha,0\beta}+ g^{\alpha\beta}g_{00,\alpha\beta}- g^{\alpha\beta}g_{\beta0,\alpha0})+ M_{00}, but I still have not figured out what to do about those three extra terms. Will anybody help, please?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top