How can radial probability densities be huge when they should be less than 1?

jaejoon89
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
I have ~5.24a_o where a_o is the Bohr radius given by 5.291772E-11 m. This is my r value. But I am getting HUGE radial probability densities ~10^8! How is this possible? I thought they have to be less than 1 since it's a probability!

P(r) = |rR(r)|^2 = [r^2 / (8a_o^3)] [(2-r/a_o)^2] exp(-r/a_o)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i think you're confusing probability denisty with probabilty

the probability of finding the electron in between r and r = dr is P(r).dr

So the integral of P(r).dr must be 1.

Although the limit of the integral goes from 0 to infinity, P(r) is only really non-zero for a few a_0. Thinking of the intergal in terms of area, as the span of r is so small, P(r) must be large for the integral to add up to one
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top