How can the energy absorbed by the water be more than the energy output?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lnvoker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Percent
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a homework problem involving the energy absorbed by water in a kettle with a resistance of 10 ohms and a 110V outlet. The calculations show that the kettle produces 290,400 joules of energy over four minutes, with 75% efficiency leading to an absorption of 217,800 joules or 60.5 watt-hours. However, the teacher's calculation suggests that the energy absorbed by the water is 108 watt-hours, which raises confusion about how the absorbed energy could exceed the output. Participants agree that the teacher's method appears incorrect, advocating for the correct application of efficiency calculations. The consensus is that the energy absorbed by the water should not exceed the total energy output from the kettle.
lnvoker
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The heating element in a kettle has a resistance of 10 ohms when it is plugged into a 110V outlet. When heating water, only 75% of the energy produced is actually absorbed by the water. How much heat energy does the water absorb if it takes 4 minutes to boil the water?



Homework Equations



V = IR
P = VI
Percent Efficiency = Useful Energy Output / Total Electrical Output



The Attempt at a Solution



1. Finding Energy Produced by Kettle

I = V / R
I = 11a

P = VI
=110 x 11
=1210 w

290 400 j (1210 x 60 x 4) of energy produced in 4 minutes
290 400j x 0.75
=217 800j / 3600
=60.5 watt hours is absorb by the water.

However, my teacher wrote this on the board:

E = V x I x t
=110 x 11 x 240 (4 minutes in seconds)
=80 2/3 watt hours (output)

% Efficiency = Useful Energy Output / Total Electrical Input
75% = 80 2/3 / Total Electrical Energy Input
E = 80 2/3 divided by 0.75
E absorbed by water = 108 watt hours

His answer confuses me... how could the energy absorbed by the water be more then the energy output?

Please help, have a "quest" on this tomorrow.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Teachers do make mistakes! He should have multiplied by .75 instead of dividing.
 
I think you make a fair point & I agree with your way

the energy absorbed by the water should not be more then the energy output...
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top