How can the Fierz Rearrangement Identity be proven for Weyl Fermions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fuchini
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity
fuchini
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have to prove the Fierz rearrengement identity for Weyl Fermions. Eq 2.20 in Martin's supersymmetry primer:

\chi_\alpha(\xi\eta)=-\xi_\alpha(\eta\chi)-\eta_\alpha(\chi\xi)

Homework Equations


We have that the antisimetric tensor raises and lowers indices.

The Attempt at a Solution


\chi_\alpha(\xi\eta)=-\xi_\alpha(\eta\chi)-\eta_\alpha(\chi\xi)=-\xi_\alpha(\eta\chi)-\eta_\alpha(\xi\chi)
\chi_\alpha(\xi\eta)=-\xi_\alpha(\eta^\beta\chi_\beta)-\eta_\alpha(\xi^\beta\chi_\beta)
\chi_\alpha(\xi\eta)=-\chi_\beta(\xi_\alpha\eta^\beta+\eta_\alpha\xi^\beta)

Now I need to prove that (\xi_\alpha\eta^\beta+\eta_\alpha\xi^\beta)=-\delta^\beta_\alpha(\xi\eta). Can anyone help me with this? Thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Generally the way to prove these formulae is to manipulate indices so that you can write an expression as a sum of terms involving just epsilons and deltas multiplying the same expression of fermions. For example:

$$\begin{split} \xi_\alpha\eta^\beta+\eta_\alpha\xi^\beta +\delta^\beta_\alpha(\xi\eta) & = \epsilon_{\alpha\gamma} \xi^\gamma \eta^\beta + \epsilon_{\alpha\gamma} \eta^\gamma \xi^\beta + \delta^\beta_\alpha \epsilon_{\gamma\delta} \xi^\gamma\eta^\delta \\
&= (\epsilon_{\alpha\gamma} \delta^\beta_\delta - \epsilon_{\alpha\delta} \delta^\beta_\gamma + \delta^\beta_\alpha \epsilon_{\gamma\delta} ) \xi^\gamma\eta^\delta.\end{split}$$

We can then manipulate the coefficent to see that it vanishes due to the Jacobi identity

$$ \epsilon_{\alpha\beta} \epsilon_{\gamma\delta} + \epsilon_{\alpha\gamma} \epsilon_{\delta\beta} + \epsilon_{\alpha\delta} \epsilon_{\beta\gamma} =0.$$

We could have directly applied this method to the original Fierz formula.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top