How can the momentum be non-zero if the probability current density is zero?

neelakash
Messages
491
Reaction score
1
I am reading One-dimensional examples from Bransden and Joachain.For the free particle solutions:Ψ=A exp [i(kx-ωt)] +B exp [–i(kx+ωt)]
they say that for |A|=|B|,the probability current density=0.This is OK.Then they say we can associate the standing wave with a free particle along the x-axis with a momentum whose magnitude is p=ћk but the direction is unknown...

My problem is I cannot understand what they say regarding momentum.If j=0,how can momentum be non-zero?

In fact, if A=0 or, B=0 I can see there is a momentum of precise value p=ћk.There j is non-zero and j=vP where P is the probability...

Also, in the very next example of a potential step they show j=0 everywhere and concludes that no net momentum in the state...

I tried to solve the problem by thinking that in the latter case, j=0 for the entire state.So, by conservation of momentum, p=0 everywhere...

But in the former case, j is not zero everywhere.So, p must conserve its non-zero value...!Or, may be that They meant momentum direction is unknown as there is no net momentum in free particle if |A|=|B|?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let me approach mathematically:

Ψ=A exp [i(kx-ωt)] +B exp [–i(kx+ωt)]

For A=B, Ψ=C cos kx exp(-iωt)

Operating this with momentum operator,we are getting
-(ћk/i) C sin(kx) exp(-iωt)

Sin and cos differ by a phase factor only...

So,momentum value matches...and the direction is "unknown" for the "i"...

what about the potential step?
 
If the two terms are present, then your particle is in a superposition of having momentum +hbar k and momentum - hbar k.

This is the momentum equivalent of being in a superposition of positions (like the wavefunction indicates you).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top