How can the small angle formula be used to measure the physical size of a star?

AI Thread Summary
The small angle formula relates the angular size of an object to its physical size and distance from the observer. To measure the physical size of a star like Betelgeuse, one must determine its angular size, which can be calculated using the inverse tangent of the radius over the distance to the star. However, most stars are too far away to have a measurable angular size, appearing as mere points even through powerful telescopes. A few nearby stars can be measured using parallax due to Earth's orbit. This discussion highlights the challenges in measuring stellar sizes due to their vast distances.
Fisicks
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
Basically this formula relates the angular size of an object (how big the object appears to an observer), the actual physical size d of the object, and the distance D from the observer to the object.

So let's say i want to find the physical size of Betelgeuse. As a scientist figuring this out, how would you find theta, or angular size of a star 600 light years away, and what is the angular size actually measuring?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what you're asking. It's simple enough to draw a right triangle with one leg as the line from the observer to the center of the star, and the other leg as a radius of the star, taken perpendicular to the first line. The angle at the observer's end is half the angular size (since we're looking at the radius and not the diameter), which you get get using the inverse tangent.

If you know the distance to the star and its angular size, which you measure optically, the you can get the radius of the star by using the tangent of the half-angle.

The angles in such cases are very small of course ...
 
thank you for clearing that up for me
 
Unfortunatly stars are too far away. Even in the best telescope they are points with no angular size. There are a few stars which are close enough to measure their paralax as the Earth moves in its orbit.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top