How Can the Tacoma Narrows Bridge Collapse Inspire Your Science Fair Project?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Azu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bridge Collapse
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a science fair project focused on the Tacoma Narrows Bridge collapse, specifically exploring how it informs bridge stability against wind forces. The participant seeks to demonstrate the flutter effect but is concerned about the cost and complexity of building a bridge model. Suggestions include using simpler materials or alternative methods, such as a fan and a strip of paper, to illustrate the flutter effect. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding aeroelasticity in both historical and modern contexts. Overall, the project aims to combine research with a practical demonstration of engineering principles.
Azu
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi, i want to do a science fair project on the Tacoma Narrows Bridge Collapse. I want to do a research on the Tacoma Narrows Bridge collapse and how it taught us what structures stabilize a bridge against wind forces.
I also want to build something that would demonstrate the flutter effect. First i thought i should build a bridge and test it in a windtunnel, but i don't know what material i should use, and i think it would be expensive.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


So, i was thinking about not building a bridge, but something else that would demonstrate the flutter effect, something that wouldn't be so expensive :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Azu! Welcome to PF! :smile:

If you want a project on aeroelastic flutter, how about going green o:), and following this up, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aeroelasticity#Flutter"
It is however not always a destructive force; recent progress has been made in small scale (table top) wind generators for underserved communities in developing countries, designed specifically to take advantage of this effect.[1][2]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A fan and a strip of paper, held at each end, might be able to demonstrate the flutter effect.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top